Laserfiche WebLink
With the aid of an overhead map of the area, Community <br />Development Director Bob Keating reviewed the Memorandum dated <br />March 11, 1996: <br />TO: _James E. Chandler <br />County Administrator <br />D ENT HEAD CONCUR NCE <br />01 OF <br />Ketng, PoC <br />THROUGH: Sasan Rohani, AICP" <br />Chief, Long -Range Planning <br />FROM: John Wachtel Gp" <br />Senior Planner, Long -Range Planning <br />DATE: March 11, 1996 <br />RE: Ben F. Bailey, III, request to amend the comprehensive <br />plan to redesignate approximately 18.4 acres from L-2 to <br />M-1, and to rezone that 18.4 acres from A-1 to RM -8 <br />PLAN AMENDMENT NUMBER: LUDA 95-07-0103 <br />It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal <br />consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at their regular <br />meeting of March 19, 1996. <br />DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS <br />This is a request to change the land use designation of <br />approximately 18.4 acres from L-2, Low -Density Residential -2 (up to <br />6 units/acre) to M-1, Medium -Density Residential -1 (up to 8 units/ <br />acre), and to -rezone that property from A-1, Agricultural District <br />(up to 1 unit/5 acres) to RM -8, Multiple -Family Residential <br />District (up to 8 units/acre). Located at the southeast corner of <br />26th Street and 58th Avenue, the subject property is owned by Ben <br />F. Bailey, III. The purpose of this request is to secure the land <br />use designation and zoning necessary to develop the site at a <br />higher residential density. <br />On October 12, 1995, the Planning and Zoning Commission voted 7-0 <br />recommend that the Board of County Commissioners transmit the <br />proposed land use amendment to the State Department of Community <br />Affairs (DCA) for their review. <br />On November 21, 1995, the Board of County Commissioners voted 5-0 <br />to transmit the proposed land use amendment request to DCA for <br />their review. <br />Consistent with state regulations, DCA reviewed the proposed <br />amendment and prepared an Objections, Recommendations and Comments <br />(ORC) Report. The ORC Report, which planning staff received on <br />February 16, 1996, did not contain any objections to the proposed <br />amendment. <br />The Board of County Commissioners is now to decide whether or not <br />to adopt the requested land use amendment. At this time, the Board <br />must also act on the proposed rezoning. <br />49 <br />March 19, 1996 <br />8m 97 PAGE 5,S9 <br />