My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
3/19/1996
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1996
>
3/19/1996
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:05:49 PM
Creation date
6/16/2015 3:23:11 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
03/19/1996
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
129
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
8m 97 FArF 616 <br />Consistency with Other Comprehensive Plan Policies and Objectives <br />While Future Land Use Element Policy 13.3 is of special relevance <br />to all comprehensive plan amendments, other objectives and policies <br />are also applicable. <br />- Transportation Element <br />Transportation Element Policy 8.1 specifically states that the <br />county recognizes that the county will be designated "urban" and <br />that an MPO will be established. Policy 8.1 -also states that the <br />county will work for a coordinated transition to MPO status. <br />Additionally; Economic Development Element Objective 9 states that <br />the county will facilitate coordination and cooperation among <br />governmental jurisdiction and agencies. By eliminating <br />inconsistencies between the comprehensive plan and the MPO plan, <br />the proposed amendment implements Transportation Element Policy 8.1 <br />and Economic Development Element Objective 9. <br />- Capital Improvements Element <br />The proposed amendment increases the county's flexibility for <br />determining when facility infrastructure capacity can be considered <br />available. For that reason, the proposed amendment is consistent <br />with several plan policies that require the maintenance of minimum <br />LOS. Those policies include Capital Improvements Element Objective <br />3 and Policy 3.5, and Traffic Circulation Element Policies 1.1 and <br />2.1. <br />While the referenced objectives and policies, including Future Land <br />Use Element Policy 13.3, are particularly applicable to this <br />request, other comprehensive plan policies and objectives also have <br />relevance. For that reason, staff evaluated the subject request <br />for consistency with all plan policies and objectives. .Based upon <br />that analysis, staff determined that the proposed -changes to the <br />Traffic Circulation and Capital Improvements Elements are <br />consistent with the comprehensive plan. <br />ANALYSIS OF REASONABLENESS OF PROPOSED AMENDMENTS <br />Traffic Circulation Element <br />The proposed changes to the Traffic Circulation Element will <br />incorporate the latest and best available data into the <br />comprehensive plan. They will also cause the plan to more <br />accurately reflect current conditions and programmed improvements. <br />The proposed amendments ensure that the county plan will be <br />consistent with the MPO's long range plan. Since all state and <br />federal highway improvement expenditures must be approved by the <br />iaJ.J. %A iuv, Laic 1GV is the county's primary transportation <br />planning agency. By giving priority, when conflicts occur, to new <br />table 4.7.4, which is consistent with the MPO plan, the new Policy <br />1.5 will ensure that the comprehensive plan is consistent with the <br />MPO plan. With the adoption of the EAR recommended comprehensive <br />plan amendments, all of the tables in the transportation element <br />will be consistent with each other and with the MPO plan. <br />Capital Improvements Element <br />The proposed capital improvements element amendment would have a <br />number of implications for the county. While the added concurrency <br />provisions would provide the county more flexibility in approving <br />development projects where adequate road capacity to accommodate <br />the impacts of new development projects does not presently exist, <br />the result would be more congestion and roadways operating below <br />76 <br />March 19, 1996 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.