My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
4/9/1996
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1996
>
4/9/1996
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:05:49 PM
Creation date
6/16/2015 3:25:18 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
04/09/1996
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
83
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
� � r <br />Commissioner Bird asked if that meant that they would be <br />willing to front the money for relocating the railroad crossing and <br />paving the road 400' in. <br />Mr. Cairns indicated that the paving would be per the <br />agreement. He assumed the developer would pave the road and Hawk's <br />Nest would reimburse them according. to the contract and that the <br />costs of the crossing would be a credit on impact fees. <br />In response to Commissioner Bird, Director Davis advised that <br />it would have qualified for reimbursement of impact fees when the <br />road was on the 20 -year program, but it subsequently has been taken <br />off the 20 -year program. He explained that impact fee credits are <br />predicated on implementation of the 20 -year program. <br />Commissioner Eggert asked for clarification as to whether the <br />developer has formally filed a site plan application. <br />Mr. Cairns advised that they had filed a site plan for <br />consideration and the pre -application came back with "how are you <br />getting access?" He responded that as soon as they get access, <br />they are prepared to go with a full scale site plan. <br />Commissioner Eggert noted that there is a difference between <br />having a pre -application conference and filing a formal site plan. <br />Mr. Cairns admitted that a formal site plan had not been <br />filed, that they are prepared to go with a formal site plan as soon <br />as they know they can move forward. If there is no credit on <br />impact fees, it will be a tough decision; they had relied on prior <br />agreements. <br />Eugene O'Neill, speaking on behalf of his parents Eugene and <br />Mary O'Neill, spoke of a different need and of having been in limbo <br />for the past 20 years. He wondered how many more years it would go <br />on. He recounted how twenty-five years ago his parents developed <br />the property (zoned industrial) between US #1 and Old Dixie Highway <br />on Storm Grove Road (the south side of the right-of-way). He <br />recalled that in 1977 the Board of County Commissioners unanimously <br />resolved that the n6ed for Storm Grove Road existed. The County <br />sued his parents, brought it as "quick -taking". His parents fought <br />the need, but the judge said he could not contest the County's <br />wisdom that it was needed, so they lost. Since 1979 there have <br />been two evolutions, one, in the early 19801s, on the County's <br />behalf where 53rd Street was invented and became politically <br />popular, notwithstanding the fact that the County had bought and <br />paid for the entire right-of-way of Storm Grove Road from US #1 to <br />King's Highway. The other evolution was that his parents do not <br />49 <br />April 9, 1996 <br />BOOK 97 PACE �� <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.