Laserfiche WebLink
BOOK 98, PAGE 2 , <br />advertised public hearings before the Planning and Zoning <br />Commission and Board of County Commissioners. Because the LDR <br />amendment is applicable county -wide, advertisement of the hearings <br />occurred in the local newspaper, and did not consist of mail -outs <br />to individual homeowners. <br />At the LDR amendment hearings, staff supported the amendment <br />allowing emergency service tow trucks in residential areas, limited <br />to one per premises and parked off-street in a garage, carport or <br />driveway. The allowance is in the public interest from the <br />standpoint of reducing response time to emergency situations. The <br />Sheriff's Department has indicated that county -wide (including <br />municipalities), there are approximately 15 towing services on the <br />Sheriff's emergency rotation list. <br />Concerning Mr. Sigler's particular circumstance, staff has <br />investigated and found that the vehicle in question is a hydraulic <br />wrecker parked at a residence down the street on which Mr. Sigler <br />resides. John and Deborah Seeley, owners of the residence with -the <br />tow truck, have indicated that the vehicle is stored in' a <br />designated driveway on their property approximately 90 feet from <br />the road. The Seeleys also indicated that, as a courtesy, they <br />contacted the adjacent property owners prior to parking the tow <br />truck at their residence, and those neighbors expressed no <br />objection. <br />It should be noted that, in 1992, the County Code Enforcement Board <br />heard a case involving the Seeleys' parking of a tow truck at their <br />previous residence. At that time, the Code Board heard testimony <br />that the Seeleys were on the Sheriff Department's emergency <br />rotation list, and ruled that parking one tow truck at the <br />residence was permissible under the circumstances. In this sense, <br />the County Commission's recent adoption of the LDR amendment serves <br />to clarify an interpretation of the Code made by the Code <br />Enforcement Board a number of years ago. <br />Staff's finding is that the tow truck in question complies with the <br />County Code amendment that allows emergency service tow truck <br />parking in residential areas, and that the general County Code <br />allowance, as specified, is in the public interest. <br />RECOMMENDATION <br />Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners find that <br />the current County Code allowance of emergency service tow trucks <br />in residential areas (with limitations as specified in the Code) is <br />sufficient and does not warrant change. <br />George sigler, 155 31st Avenue S.W., explained his <br />understanding of the tow truck regulations and described what it <br />was like having a tow truck in his residential neighborhood. He <br />didn't question the need for tow trucks, but it appeared to him <br />that his neighbors, the Seeleys, were operating their Tropic Towing <br />business out of their residence in spite of having a business <br />location off Old Dixie Highway. He complained of noise from the <br />truck's back up horns and the smell of diesel fuel and claimed the <br />private road to the neighborhood, maintained by the 12 homeowners <br />in the neighborhood, was being negatively impacted by the weight of <br />16 <br />May 14, 1996 <br />