My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5/14/1996
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1996
>
5/14/1996
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:05:49 PM
Creation date
6/16/2015 3:40:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
05/14/1996
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
112
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
� ® r <br />the heavy tow truck. He also advised that wrecked vehicles were <br />being towed in and out of the neighborhood 3-4 times a day, and <br />stored in the neighborhood. Mr. Sigler passed photographs to the <br />Board. (Clerk's Note: The photographs were not furnished to the <br />Clerk for the record.) He also felt property values were being <br />negatively impacted by the operation of a towing business from the <br />neighborhood. <br />Mr. Sigler estimated that the 15 towing services on the <br />county's rotation list had the capability of removing 60 cars in an <br />emergency in the county, when the actual need was only about 2. He <br />suggested possible solutions: that since the County was permitting <br />this to occur in a residential neighborhood, that the County take <br />over the road's maintenance; that adjustments be made to the <br />property assessments because the values have decreased due to the <br />presence of these vehicles in the neighborhood; that tow trucks be <br />allowed in residential neighborhoods only during evening hours or <br />given additional time to respond to the tow job; or give the tow <br />truck operator a waiver to put a bed in his office. He believed <br />most of their business at night is moving disabled cars, not cars <br />which have been involved in an accident. He suggested that with 15 <br />towing services, 3 at a time on rotation for a week or so should be <br />enough. He thought that would be a reasonable solution. <br />When she had considered this ordinance, Commissioner Eggert <br />advised that she did not expect tow trucks would be doing business <br />from their residences, nor towing wrecks into the neighborhood. <br />County Attorney Vitunac advised that he did not see any reason <br />for a towed vehicle to be in the neighborhood. He asked Director <br />Keating if there was any exception for that to his knowledge. <br />Community Development Director Bob Keating explained that the <br />change to the LDR's was specifically to allow tow trucks to be in <br />a neighborhood in order to be able to respond to emergencies, but <br />not to tow cars back into the neighborhood. He would consider that <br />to be a violation of the ordinance. <br />Commissioner Eggert asked if there is any definition of <br />emergency versus disabled cars in the ordinance, and Director <br />Keating responded that there is not. He advised that any of the <br />proposed solutions would be up to the Sheriff or Police Chiefs to <br />change the rotation. <br />Chairman Adams advised that this was the first complaint she <br />was aware of concerning tow trucks in residential neighborhoods. <br />17 <br />May 14, 1996 <br />mow L: <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.