Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />• <br />Continued erosion has limited the availability of quality beaches and has <br />contributed to the increased cost of shore protection. Additionally, an <br />unprecedented number of seawalls have been constructed over the past three <br />(3) years, further degrading the aesthetic qualities of the shoreline, Earlier <br />attempts to artificially protect upland structures included rock revetments and <br />sand filled tubes. Additionally, major habitable structures have been condemned <br />and lost to erasion over the past ten (10) years. <br />Without adequate large-scale shore protection mechanisms in place, the number <br />of seawalls is expected to increase. Prudent development decisions along the <br />remaining undeveloped beachfront can help in beach preservation, However, <br />most oceanfront property has already been developed and these valuable <br />structures cannot readily be moved landward to provide for new beachfront. <br />A comprehensive beach management plan is an economically preferable <br />approach to restoration of the County's beach. The following economic analysis <br />and cost allocation provides some alternatives for financing such a plan. <br />1.1 PURPOSE <br />The purpose of this analysis is to examine the overall economic viability of beach <br />nourishment along five (5) sectors of Indian River County shoreline, as described <br />in the County's adopted BPP to determine the benefits attributed to those <br />individual benefiniary groups who are expected to realize them over the design <br />life, of the iriantifiar♦ nrniarte <br />The work product described herein compiles new economic data and information, <br />analyzes project -related benefits to identified beneficiaries and evaluates <br />alternative funding sources and cast allocation methods to fund the costs of the <br />County's comprehensive beach nourishment program. <br />