6/13/1996 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

time, and site planning has to be worked out. The three firms were also advised that the availability of the 5 -acre parcel was 10 years away. Commissioner Bird wondered if there would be any negative affect due to the 5 acres, and Director Pinto advised that parcel will be incorporated into the park when it becomes available, it j will not obstruct development, nor is it critical to the development of the park. Infrastructure access must be available on the 5 -acre parcel and the Dritenbas' lease is structured in that manner. In response to Commissioner Macht, County Attorney Vitunac instructed the Board that by law they were required to rank the 3 proposers for negotiation purposes. He also suggested that the Board inform the negotiators what they wanted included in the contract. Commissioner Macht felt it important to research -.the vera -city of what they had heard today. ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by Commissioner Tippin, the Board unanimously ranked the presenters as follows: INRIVCO RECYCLING PARK LLC MUNICIPAL WASTE MANAGEMENT NORTON ENVIRONMENTAL. Chairman Adams inquired if direction to negotiators should be in writing from the individual Commissioners, and County Attorney Vitunac replied that it is important to have a general policy to direct the negotiators. Commissioner Eggert thought that was covered in the RFQP. Administrator Chandler thought that negotiations could become very complicated with a lot of different disciplines (e.g.: financial, legal, technical) which will have to be considered and consolidated to negotiate a contract in everybody's best interest. Commissioner Eggert stressed that the County has to be enormously careful and go over the contract word -by -word, not just line -by-line to make sure it is correct and includes everything discussed. 28 June 13, 1996 Boa 98 FAr,c:358