My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06/20/2023
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2020's
>
2023
>
06/20/2023
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/14/2023 10:17:51 AM
Creation date
8/11/2023 1:07:43 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Date
06/20/2023
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
620
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
PUBLIC HEARING <br />As per section 910.07 of the County's LDRs, conditional concurrency review examines the available <br />capacity of each facility with respect to a proposed project. Since rezoning requests are not development <br />projects, County regulations call for the concurrency review to be based upon the most intense use of <br />the subject property allowed within the requested zoning district. <br />For residential rezoning requests, the most intense use (according to the County's LDRs) is the maximum <br />number of units that could be built on the site, given the size of the property and the maximum density <br />under the proposed zoning. The site information used for the concurrency analysis is as follows: <br />1. Size of Area to be Rezoned: <br />2. Existing Zoning District: <br />3. Proposed Zoning District: <br />4. Most Intense Use of Subject Property <br />Under Existing Zoning District: <br />5. Most Intense Use of Subject Property <br />Under Proposed Zoning District: <br />± 51.78 acres <br />A-1, Agricultural -1 District (up to 1 unit/5acres) <br />RM -6, Multiple -Family Residential District (up to 6 <br />units/acre) <br />10 Single -Family Units <br />310 Multiple -Family Units <br />Item H - Whether or not the proposed amendment would result in significant adverse impacts on <br />the natural environment. <br />The subject property proposed to be rezoned from A-1 to RM -6 is currently undeveloped land. Since the <br />subject property contains no land designated by the State of Florida or the U.S. Federal Government as <br />environmentally sensitive or protected land, such as wetlands or sensitive uplands, rezoning the site is <br />anticipated to have no adverse impacts on environmental quality. When development is proposed for the <br />subject site, a more detailed environmental analysis based on the site-specific development proposal will <br />be conducted. <br />Item I - Whether or not the proposed amendment would result in an orderly and logical <br />development pattern, specifically identifying any negative effects on such pattern. <br />The proposed amendment is consistent with the comprehensive plan and the surrounding land uses and <br />will provide for a logical and orderly pattern of uses. <br />Item J - Whether or not the proposed amendment would be in conflict with the public interest, <br />and is in harmony with the purpose and interest of the land development regulations. <br />Staff has not identified any detrimental effect to the public welfare, and believes the request is in <br />harmony with the purpose and intent of the land development regulations. <br />Item K - Any other matters that may be deemed appropriate by the planning and zoning <br />commission or the board of county commissioners in review and consideration of the proposed <br />amendment such as police protection, fire protection, and emergency medical services. <br />5 <br />412 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.