1999-187 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

6 6 El • 7 Indian River County Summer 1998 Beach Survey Table 4 Percent Residents and Visitors Interpretation: The numbers represent the percentage of respondents who are either classified as residents or visitors who were interviewed at each beach. For example, 35.9% of the beach users interviewed at Sections I & 2 Beach were classified as residents; 46.1% of all the respondents interviewed were classified as residents. Table 5 Breakout of Iridian River Resident Respondents _ % People on Each Beach Nome Location 1 Sections 1 & 2. 2 Section 3 3 Section 5. 4. Section 7 All Residents 35.9% 45J% 50.2% 0.0% 46.1% Visitors 64.1% 54.4% 49.8% 100.0% 53.6% [b!A 0.0% 0.5% 0.0% 0.0% 0.2% Interpretation: The numbers represent the percentage of respondents who are either classified as residents or visitors who were interviewed at each beach. For example, 35.9% of the beach users interviewed at Sections I & 2 Beach were classified as residents; 46.1% of all the respondents interviewed were classified as residents. Table 5 Breakout of Iridian River Resident Respondents _ % People on La__ pCgGi_ Place ns 2 Section 3 3 Section S. 4. Section 7 1EZ2. All I On Island E AIA 0.0% 2.6% 0.7% 0.0% 1.6% On Island W AIA 10.7% 7.7% 5.3% 0.0% 6.9% Mainland E of 195 60.7% 73.3% 51.3% 0.0% 63.5% Mainland W of 195 10.7% 6.7% 9.9% 0.0% 8.3% Vero Beach Total _ 17.9% 9 7% 3L.J /V 0.0 io 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% o -19 19-0 0% IIIterprelation: "Ile numbers rapwsent lite percentage of beach user~ by area of residence with Indian Ri"'er County "rho in the inlen'icwed parties at each beach. Pur example. 60.7'%. of the peach users at Sections I k 2 Beach resided on the nutinland in Indian Rivet County east of 1-95 and "rest o1, the intercoastal "rater"ra\; 19.7 percent of all the beach users inlerviet"'ed responded that Ihcy lived in \'cro Beach. /\x ntis.hl be ezpecled..la\'cee 11:nk had the tawc"l percenlatt. of \�clo Beach wSpolident..