My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7/23/1996
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1996
>
7/23/1996
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:05:50 PM
Creation date
6/17/2015 9:53:07 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
07/23/1996
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
127
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
PUOK 658 <br />1. Size of Area to be Rezoned: t2 acres <br />2. Existing Zoning Classification: RMH-8, Mobile home <br />Residential District (up <br />to 8 units/acre) <br />3. Maximum Number of Units with Existing Zoning: 16 <br />4. Proposed Zoning Classification: RS -6, Single-family <br />Residential District (up <br />to 6 units/acre) <br />5. Maximum Number of Units with Proposed Zoning: 12 <br />As per section 910.07(2) of the Concurrency Management Chapter of <br />the County's Land Development Regulations, projects which do not <br />increase density or intensity of use are exempt from concurrency <br />requirements. This rezoning request is exempt from concurrency <br />review because the requested zoning would not increase the total <br />number of potential units that the site could accommodate. <br />It is important to note that there will be no effect on service <br />levels for any public facility as a result of development under the <br />proposed zoning. <br />In this case, a detailed concurrency analysis will be done in <br />conjunction with site development. That concurrency analysis will <br />address facility service levels and demand. <br />Comoatibility with the Surrounding Area <br />Since land abutting the subject property on the north is zoned RS - <br />6, the request is for a, continuation of an existing zoning pattern. <br />Given the current RMH-8 zoning of the subject property, it is not <br />anticipated that a change to RS -6 would result in compatibility <br />problems with the surrounding areas. Under either the RMH-8 or RS - <br />6 zoning districts, development of the subject property would <br />produce similar impacts on adjacent property. Because of the lower <br />density, however, the impacts associated with the RS -6 zoning <br />district would be somewhat less. <br />For these reasons, staff feels that the RS -6 zoning district is <br />appropriate for the subject property and would result in <br />development compatible with the surrounding area. <br />Consistency with Comprehensive Plan <br />Rezoning requests are reviewed for consistency with all policies of <br />the comprehensive plan. Rezonings must also be consistent with the <br />overall designation of land uses as depicted on the future land use <br />map, which include agriculture, residential, recreation, <br />conservation, and commercial and industrial land uses and their <br />densities. Commercial and industrial land uses are located in <br />nodes throughout the unincorporated areas of Indian River County. <br />The goals, objectives and policies are. the most important parts of <br />the comprehensive plan. Policies are statements in the plan which <br />identify the actions which the County will take in order to direct <br />the community's development. As courses of action committed to by <br />the County, policies provide the basis for all County development <br />decisions. While all comprehensive plan policies are important, <br />some have more applicability than others in reviewing rezoning <br />requests. Of particular applicability for this request are the <br />following comprehensive plan policies. <br />80 <br />JULY 239 1996 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.