Laserfiche WebLink
11 <br />• <br />Section V. Environmental Review (NOTE: This application cannot be processed lfthis secfitrn is pat cafftpleterf) <br />Because the IIMGPlFMA are federally funded programs, all projects aro required to undergo an environmental review a$ part of tine <br />grant application process. Moreover, alt projects must comply with the National 13nvirottnlental Policy Act (NEPA) and associated <br />Federal, Statc,'rribal, and Local statutes to obtain funding. NO WORK can lie tinne prior to the NEPA review process. H work is <br />done on your proposed project before (lie NFPA review is completed, it will NOT be eligible for Federal funding. <br />A. National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Documents <br />All projectsmust have adequatcNEPAdocanrentatiotr that enables fire FEMA RegionalEnvl'ronnrental l7f eerto determine iftheproposed <br />project complies with NEPA aad associated statutes. rile FEMA Mitigation Division Erivirownental Specialists provide comprehensive <br />NEPA technical assistance for States and Applicants, with their consent, to complete the NEPA revicty. The type and quantity of NEPA <br />documents required to snake this defernir'nation varies depending upon the project's size, location, and complexity. However, at a <br />miaimum, please provide the applicable domnientation from this section ro facilitate the NEPA compliance process. <br />Ifyour project fits into one of fine descriptions listed below. <br />development of mitigation plans; <br />inspection and monitoring activities; <br />studies involving only staff time and funding; <br />training activities using existing facilities; <br />please include rite follow^1119 required NEPA docianentation: <br />0 Detailed project description, scope of work, and budget/costs (Section 11(p. 3) and Section IV (p. 4)) <br />For all other projects, attackrinclude the following NEPA documetrts/in,,fornration - <br />* Detailed project description, scope of work, and budget/cos is (See [ion I (p. 3) and Section IV (p, S) of this application) <br />* Project arca maps (Section It 1, part A & B of this application (p. 4)). <br />U Project arca/structure photographs (Section 111, part C of this application (p. 4)). <br />11 project altematives description and impacts (part B of this section of the application (pp. 7-9)). <br />❑ A letter from the State Historic Preservation Officer (S11PO) regarding cultural resources (archeological and historic) in <br />the project area (Non: Please inform the slipo if a structure to be altered is over 50 years old.) <br />❑ Provide any applicable information ordocumentationreferencedonthe "itrfannarionandLiocumentationNeeds byProjecf <br />Type" chart (page to or this application) <br />B. Alternative Actions <br />lite NEPA process requires that at least two alternative actions he considered that address the sante probIcntlissue as the proposed <br />project. in this section, list two feasible alternativc projects to mitigate the hazards faced in lite project area. One alternative is <br />the "No Action Alternative." <br />No Action Alternative <br />f)iscuss tine impacts on the project arca if no action is taken: <br />If no action is taken, there will be a continued public safety threat to the ciii7ens of Indian Sliver County due to the <br />current deficit of "safe" slicltcr space. <br />Page 8 of 15 <br />