My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2000-366
CBCC
>
Official Documents
>
2000's
>
2000
>
2000-366
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/20/2024 11:51:27 AM
Creation date
8/20/2024 11:50:32 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Official Documents
Official Document Type
Application
Approved Date
12/05/2000
Control Number
2000-366
Agenda Item Number
11.H.3.
Entity Name
St. Johns Water Management District
Subject
Alternative Water Supply Grant Application
for Reduction of Reverse Osmosis Concentration into
the Indian River Lagoon
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Indian River County Utilities <br />Concentrate Disposal Options <br />UAB Response: <br />The UAB decided against pursuit of this option in lieu of other potential options at the <br />May 4, 2000 meeting. <br />3.4 Stormwater Mixing <br />Concentrate may be diluted with stormwater for disposal. Mixing the concentrate <br />with stormwater would require that the stormwater system be available for <br />connection. Possible problems include retention volume, mixing ratio and reliability <br />of stormwater volumes. Since concentrate production is constant, a consistent supply <br />of stormwater would be required for diluting purposes. This option may be <br />advantageous during wet weather. <br />UAB Response: <br />The UAB recommended this option be pursued as an option once the Stormwater <br />Master planning efforts are underway. Further discussions with Indian River Farms <br />Water Control District are necessary. <br />3.5 Reuse Mixing <br />Mixing reuse water with concentrate and disposing the product through the reuse <br />water distribution system is another possible solution. The concentrate water would <br />have to be blended with reuse water at a ratio that would allow the water to be land <br />applied for irrigation purposes. Possible problems would include possible vegetation <br />intolerance to saltier water and the availability of reuse volume for dilution purposes. <br />Also the possible gradual buildup of salts in the areas of discharge may become a <br />problem. See Figure 1. <br />UAB Response: <br />The UAB believes this option in conjunction with other possible options will be the <br />most immediate and viable means of diverting; concentrate from the North County <br />plant and current discharge point. A pilot study ata nearby golf course pond is <br />recommended prior to full scale implementation. <br />3.6 Disposal to North VV VTP <br />The North County WWTP is a one million gallon per day wastewater treatment plant <br />See Figure 2. The concentrate could be diverted to the plant, mixed with the influent, <br />and treated and disposed as the North plant's effluent. The plant would only be able <br />to take a portion of the 600,000 gallons per day of concentrate produced at North <br />County facility. The rest of the concentrate would have to be disposed in another <br />manner. <br />UAB Response: <br />The UAB recommended not to pursue this option at the May 4 meeting since salts <br />pass through the treatment process. <br />CDM Camp LNtwr & stcx.e ins. <br />ro nl d 11116M <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.