Laserfiche WebLink
40 <br />0 <br />i <br />5]RWMD Alternative. Water Supplies Construction Cost Sharing Application Foran 2000-2001 <br />EVALUATION FACTOR related to question. 4. <br />Is the project in an arca identified by the S]RWMD Water Supply Assessment as a priority waver resource <br />caution area or a. delineated arca? `Ibis will be determined for you by SJRWMD staff. 0-5 points. Yes, Inside <br />carrlion area = 5. Yes, Inside delineated area m 3,° No, O nlside caution area andlor delineated area = 0. <br />S. Projected schedule <br />Projected starting date: mo. _lung yr. 2001. Completion date: mo. lana _ yr. 2042_. <br />(Funds received through this program may be used only for projects constructed after a cost sharing <br />contract has been executed and may not be used to reimburse the cost of existing structures or structures <br />alreadv under construction. Cost sharing contracts probably will be executed in April or May 200 1). <br />6. Will water from this project directly take the place of an existing or proposed withdrawal from a higher <br />quality water source?.................................................................. yes W__ No <br />If yes, identify the source and quantity of higher duality water to be replaced. <br />Floridan aquifer ............. yes ✓ no 160.6_ million gallons ner year <br />Surficial aquifer ........... yes no V, _ million gallons per year <br />Surface water .............. yes no rte' million gallons per year <br />If surface water, state name of water body <br />EVALUATION FACTOR related to question 6. <br />Will water from this project directly and cticctiveiy take the place of an existing or proposed higher quality <br />water source? 0-20 points. Based on rater :s assessment of the effectiveness gf'the projuer at saving potable <br />wider and apparent relative carr effiedivermys. Because rf the great variation in types oj'prc�fecrs, calcidations <br />oj'cost effeetivenessJbr widely dissinfilar priujects, Brach as turban reirse and agricultural freeze protection ponds <br />will nal be compared. <br />7. Does the project provide other water resource; benefits in addition to water supply, such as improving or <br />protecting ground or surface water quality, increasing recharge or conserving water? Yes rf No -- <br />If yes, then describe benefits'? You may add one page attachment behind Ibis page if necessary. <br />Constructing a third stagg.RAL membra:ic will result in a net reduction of approximately 375,OOO-GPiD <br />less concentrate � unleased tothe lndiarr River. <br />EVALUA'T'ION FACTOR related to question 7. <br />Does the project provide other water resource benefits in addition to water supply, such as improving or <br />protecting ground or surface water quality, increasing recharge or conserving water? 0-10 paints. Based on <br />rater 's assessment gI-the extent and significance ref additional benefits. <br />fags A - a <br />♦413lAh1ilRiY Y'A YYrAh�IIM1]r{IClB,AlIAiH„w►i'YIIry(yrnAma4F++A•.•—IY.r1'nwryhlrna..akr 5pll14.uxursYiy.RlMn kl.a,rrw4. Yq,/, Ay,Mrt.a.WSL{.,. PW <br />11.11. <br />