10/8/1996 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

The Board reviewed a Memorandum of October 2, 1996: TO: James Chandler County Administrator DI ION HW CONCURRr3NCE: Obert M. KeYtfinA C Community Develop ent D' ector ,4•6, THROUGH: Stan Boling, AICP Planning Director FROM: John W. McCoy, AICP•::�W N, Senior Planner, Current Development DATE: October 2, 1996 SUBJECT: Erol Atamer's Request for Planned Development (PD) Special Exception Use Approval for a Single Family PD to be Known as Hampton Woods East It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at its regular meeting of October 8, 1996. DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS: Mosby & Associates, Inc. has submitted an application for PD special exception use approval and -preliminary PD plan approval, on behalf of Erol and Beth Atamer, to construct a 4 lot single family planned development. The subject property is located south of 16th Street, on the east side of 46th Avenue (see attachment #2). The subject property is zoned RS -2, Residential Single Family up to 2 units/acre. The area around the subject property is generally characterized by large lot development. - The proposed PD will access 46th Avenue which is a private street platted with the Hampton Woods subdivision in 1975. Currently, 46th Avenue serves the 6 Hampton Woods lots (west side of the road) and properties on the east side of the road, including the subject property. The existing right- of-way and street width of 46th Avenue are marginally below current county standards. The applicant is seeking waivers to the minimum pavement and right-of-way widths in order to save existing trees along the roadway and preserve the character of the area. *Planning and Zoning C-4asion Action At its -August 22, 1996 Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, the Planning and Zoning Commission voted unanimously to recommend that the Board of County Commissioners grant special exception use approval with the condition recommended by staff. In addition, the Planning and Zoning Commission recommended that the number of trees removed to accommodate water line and stormwater improvements necessary to serve the proposed project be limited (see attachment #4). Since the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, planning staff has worked closely with the applicant, the project engineer, and other county departments to develop specific ways to implement the Planning and Zoning Commission's recommendation. Staff's recommendation contained at the end of this report specifically addresses the concerns expressed by the Planning and Zoning Commission. *PD Process The PD project review and approval process is as follows: Approval Needed 1. Conceptual Plan/Special Exception 2. Preliminary PD Plan OCTOBER 8, 1996 43 Reviewing Body PZC & BCC PZC boa