My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10/08/2024
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2020's
>
2024
>
10/08/2024
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/5/2024 10:41:14 AM
Creation date
12/5/2024 10:25:22 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Date
10/08/2024
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
403
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
at this time, such as missing quarterly reports, payment voucher/reimbursement, equipment, questions, <br />etc. <br />Post Monitoring Visit <br />Division personnel shall review the On-site monitoring worksheets and backup documentation as a team <br />and discuss the events of the On-site monitoring. <br />Within forty-five (45) calendar days of the site visit, a post monitoring letter shall be generated and sent to <br />the grantee explaining any issues and corrective actions required or commendations. Should issues or <br />findings be identified, a noncompliance letter to that effect shall be generated and sent to the Sub - <br />Recipient. The Sub -Recipient shall submit a Corrective Action Plan (CAP) within a timeframe as <br />determined by the Division. Noncompliance on behalf of sub -grantees is resolved by management under <br />the terms of the Sub -Grant Agreement. The On-site monitoring report and all back up documentation shall <br />then be included in the Sub -Recipient's file. <br />Monitoring Responsibilities of Pass-thru Entities <br />Sub -Recipients who are pass-through entities are responsible for monitoring their Sub -Recipients in a <br />manner consistent with the terms of the Federal award at 2 C.F.R. Part 200, including 2 C.F.R. § <br />200.332. This includes the pass-through entity's responsibility to monitor the activities of the Sub - <br />Recipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, in compliance with <br />federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward; and that subaward <br />performance goals are achieved. <br />Sub -Recipient responsibilities also include but are not limited to: accounting of receipts and expenditures, <br />cash management, maintaining adequate financial records, reporting and refunding expenditures <br />disallowed by audits, monitoring if acting as a pass-through entity, other assessments and reviews, and <br />ensuring overall compliance with the terms and conditions of the award or subaward, as applicable, <br />including the terms of 2 C.F.R. Part 200. <br />[Remainder of page intentionally left blank] <br />ATTACHMENT K <br />EHP GUIDELINES <br />ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING $ HISTORIC PRESERVATION (EHP) COMPLIANCE GUIDELINES <br />As a federal agency, FEMA is required to consider the effects of its actions on the environment and/or <br />historic properties to ensure that all activities and programs funded by the agency, including grants - <br />funded projects, comply with federal EHP regulations, laws and Executive Orders as applicable. Sub - <br />Recipient's proposing projects that have the potential to impact the environment, including but not limited <br />to construction of communication towers, modification or renovation of existing buildings, structures and <br />facilities, or new construction including replacement of facilities, must participate in the FEMA EHP review <br />process. The EHP review process involves the submission of a detailed project description that explains <br />the goals and objectives of the proposed project along with supporting documentation so that FEMA may <br />determine whether the proposed project has the potential to impact environmental resources and/or <br />historic properties. In some cases, FEMA also is required to consult with other regulatory agencies and <br />the public in order to complete the review process. The EHP review process must be completed and <br />approved before funds are released to carry out the proposed project. FEMA will not fund projects that <br />are initiated without the required EHP review. <br />.: <br />113 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.