My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10/15/1996
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1996
>
10/15/1996
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:05:51 PM
Creation date
6/17/2015 8:53:12 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
10/15/1996
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
70
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
M M <br />the FAA U. e. a combination day/night tower <br />lighting system that provides white strobe lighting <br />during the day and red pulsing lighting during the <br />night) . <br />3. The reviewing body shall consider the impact of the <br />proposed tower on residential subdivisions near the <br />project site; <br />Note: Originally, the applicant proposed placing <br />the tower on the north side of the Kids Krusade <br />parcel in a location close to 16th Street and <br />residentially designated property. In response to <br />a staff recommendation, the applicant moved the <br />tower site to the south side of the Kids Krusade <br />parcel, close to 12th Street and adjacent to <br />agriculturally designated property. In staff's <br />opinion, the proposed site is better located, away <br />from future residential development. <br />4. All property owners within six hundred (600) feet <br />of the property boundary shall receive written <br />notice; <br />5. Applicants shall explain in writing why no other <br />existing tower facility could be used to meet the <br />applicant's transmitting/receiving needs. An <br />application may be denied if existing tower <br />facilities can be used; <br />Note: The applicant has submitted justification <br />for the proposed tower location (see attachment <br />#4) . <br />6. Towers shall be designed to accommodate multiple <br />users; <br />7. A condition of approval for any tower application <br />shall be that the tower shall be available for <br />.other parties and interests. This shall be <br />acknowledged in a written agreement between the <br />applicant and the county, on a form acceptable to <br />the county, that will run with the land. <br />Note: The applicant is currently finalizing the <br />language of this agreement with the county <br />attorney's office. The agreement must be finalized <br />prior to release of the approved site plan. <br />Each of these 15 criteria has been addressed by the applicant, <br />subject to conditions referenced in the analysis. <br />16. Dedications and Improvements: The LDRs do not require any <br />dedications or improvements connected with the proposed <br />development of this site, and none is proposed. <br />Based on the analysis performed, staff recommends that the Board of <br />County Commissioners grant special exception use approval for the <br />requested tower with the following conditions: <br />1. That prior to site plan release, the applicant shall obtain <br />either a county "airport construction permit" or "airport <br />construction variance". <br />27 600K 99 Pari X25 <br />OCTOBER 15, 1996 <br />PFJ <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.