Laserfiche WebLink
BOOK 99 P,fu 617 <br />Recommendation: Although there is some risk in either of the first two <br />alternatives, staff recommends proceeding with alternative #2 if the Board <br />desires to make public wastewater service available to the lot in question. <br />Richard Henn, a resident on Durrance Place, asked why other <br />property owners had not been notified and wondered what made the <br />lot in question unique. He also believed that he was being used <br />for the benefit of someone else, advised that he wanted the sewer <br />originally, predicted this was a foot in the door, and that the lot <br />in question was subdivided in spite of advice against same to the <br />prior owner. Mr. Henn also reported that his father-in-law was not <br />in favor of approval in this matter. <br />County Attorney Vitunac responded that notification is done <br />in rezoning matters and explained that the platted road is under <br />water and that no one has paid taxes on the road. <br />In response to Chairman Adams, Utility Services Director Terry <br />Pinto advised there was no intent to force anyone to hook up unless <br />they request it. <br />Chairman Adams predicted the Board would be seeing more of <br />these requests. <br />Mr. Henn asked if his yard would be dug up, and County <br />Attorney Vitunac advised that the line would be put under the road. <br />ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by <br />Commissioner Bird, the Board unanimously approved <br />Alternative #2, as recommended in the Memorandum. <br />ISSUE RFP FOR SPECIAL PUBLIC DEFENDER <br />The Board reviewed a Memorandum of October 29, 1996: <br />TO: Board of County Commissioners <br />FROM: Terrence P. O'Brien - Assistant County Attorney <br />DATE: October 29, 1996 <br />RE: SPECIAL PUBLIC DEFENDER CONTRACT <br />Since January, 1993, the County has had a contract with the law offices <br />of James T. Long, P.A., to provide legal representation of indigent <br />adults and juveniles in certain types of criminal cases. The contract <br />was awarded after a committee comprised of a commissioner, the chief <br />judge of the 19th Circuit, the Public Defender and the County Attorney - - <br />determined that it was both cost-effective and efficient for the County <br />100 <br />November 5, 1996 <br />�� i <br />