Laserfiche WebLink
HEARING DATES FOR LDR AMENDMENTS (NOT RELATED TO <br />TOWERS) <br />The Board reviewed a Memorandum of October 30, 1966: <br />TO: James E. Chandler <br />County Administrator <br />DI ION HEAD CONCURRENCE: <br />Rober M. Keating, ICPZector <br />Community De��v11�e►►lopm nt D <br />FROM: Stan Boling,�AICP <br />Planning Director <br />DATE: October 30, 1996 <br />SUBJECT: Approval of Hearing Dates for Two Board Hearings to <br />Consider LDR Amendments Not Related to Communication <br />Towers <br />It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal <br />consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at its regular <br />meeting of November 5, 1996. <br />BACKGROUND: <br />Until the 1995 state legislative session, all land development <br />regulation (LDR) amendments required two evening hearings of the <br />Board of County Commissioners. However, 1995 legislation allows <br />some flexibility in meeting times, although two hearings are still <br />required for one of the types of amendments being proposed. To <br />minimize the number of required hearings, staff limits the number <br />of times the LDRs are amended. This has been done by holding <br />proposed LDR amendments until a sufficient number of amendments <br />exists to process and consider at one time. <br />Presently, staff is holding -off on scheduling Board consideration <br />of LDR amendments relating to communication towers, since the Board <br />is scheduled to workshop tower issues separately. However, there <br />are several proposed LDR amendments not related to communication <br />towers which now require consideration and action by the Board of <br />County Commissioners. These proposed amendments have been <br />collected by staff over the last several months and have been <br />initiated by staff, the Board of County Commissioners, and a <br />private party. This set of LDR amendments relates to several <br />issues, including the following: <br />1. Modifications to extend land development permit and <br />preliminary plat approval timeframes. <br />2. Restatement of special setbacks for utility sheds. <br />3. Minor revisions/update of handicap parking requirements. <br />4. Clarification of concurrency criterion for accessory dwelling <br />units. <br />5. Referencing "fueling position" rather than "pump" regarding <br />the traffic impact fee category for gasoline sales. <br />75 <br />November 5, 1996 <br />5ooK 99 PAGE592 <br />