My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04/29/2025
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2020's
>
2025
>
04/29/2025
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/30/2025 12:01:39 PM
Creation date
5/1/2025 1:25:18 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Value Adjustment Board
Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Date
04/29/2025
Meeting Body
Value Adjustment Board
Subject
Final Meeting for the 2024 Tax Season
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
103
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The petitioner presented five comparable sales. The petitioner testified that in their <br />opinion, Sale 3 was most similar to the subject due to size. (It is note that Sale 3 <br />was also used by the PA. Sale 2 was the June 2024 sale of an oceanfront patio <br />home in Sea Forest Court. It's located on a 0.36 acre lot with 57 FF on the ocean. <br />Because this property sold in mid -2024 it was excluded, by the Special Magistrate, <br />from the comparable sales analysis.) <br />The remaining comparable sold between $2,985,000 to $11,000,000 or from $709 <br />SF to a high of $1,286 SF. The comparables ranged in size from 2,322 SF to <br />11,581 SF. The comparable sales were adjusted for the difference in building size, <br />ocean frontage and bathroom count. A 15% cost of sale deduction was also made. <br />(It was based on the recorded sale price not the adjusted sale price or the <br />preliminary value indication.) The adjustments were based on $100 SF for the <br />difference in living area, $5,000 FF for the difference in ocean frontage and <br />$50,000 per full bathroom for the difference in the bathroom count. (It is noted that <br />the living area square footage adjustment and the front footage adjustment were <br />considered to be substantially under the contributory value of each. No adjustment <br />was applied for the difference in effective age.) <br />After adjustments, the petitioner's comparable sales (including Sale 2 and <br />deducting the COS from the recorded sale price of the comparables) indicated -a <br />just value range from $2,767,850 to $7,302,800 or between $518 SF to $1,192 SF <br />with an average of $799 SF. (The average of the comparable sales was not shown <br />but was $4,044,910.) The petitioner applied the average sale price of $799 SF (in <br />the petitioner's analysis that including Sale 2) to the 4,409 SF of living area to <br />arrive at a just value for the subject of $3,525,000. <br />(Remodeling the petitioner's grid, excluding Sale 2 and deducting the COS from <br />the adjusted sale price of the comparables, indicated a just value range from <br />$2,731,645 to $7,609,880 or between $531 SF to $1,176 SF. The average of the <br />comparable sales was $4,583,434 or $788 SF (again excluding Sale 2). Appling the <br />average sale price of the comparables of $788 SF, a just value of $3,475,176 is <br />indicated. Below is a summary of the petitioner's 4 comparables. The adjustments <br />and just value indications vary slightly from the petitioner's chart due to deducting <br />the COS from the adjusted sale price of the comparables and rounding <br />adjustments.) <br />2024-162 <br />Page 4 <br />-78- <br />Page 5 of 8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.