Laserfiche WebLink
4. October 10, 1996: public hearing before the Planning and <br />Zoning Commission to recommend LDR changes related to <br />communications towers. (Note: no minutes of this meeting are <br />available yet.) <br />Based upon direction given by the Board, a November 13, 1996 <br />workshop on communication towers has been scheduled. Staff has <br />arranged for two experts to attend the workshop: public sector <br />tower planning consultant Ted Krienes and FCC attorney Jeff <br />Steinberg. Staff has also run a public workshop courtesy <br />advertisement in the Press Journal and has invited staff and local <br />officials of other area local governments to attend the workshop. <br />As with the other public meetings on tower issues, staff has also <br />contacted commercial and amateur communications interests regarding <br />the workshop. <br />The goal of the workshop is two -fold. First, it is an opportunity <br />for the Board to learn about potential demands, legal constraints, <br />siting alternatives, design alternatives, and regulatory <br />opportunities relating to communication towers. Second, it is an <br />opportunity for the Board to identify specific communication tower <br />related land use concerns. Based upon the Board's expression of <br />such concerns, staff can then initiate or complete any necessary <br />planning activities or regulation changes. <br />ANALYSIS: <br />As a result of workshops and public meetings, the approach taken to <br />date to address concerns about tower proliferation has been to <br />develop proposed modifications to the county's existing tower <br />regulations. The latest version of proposed tower LDR amendments, <br />based upon recommendations at the October 10th Planning.and Zoning <br />Commission meeting, are provided with attachment, -#3. Despite all <br />of its efforts, the Planning and Zoning Commission has not been <br />able to articulate all of its tower related land use concerns. <br />Although the Commission acted on a set of proposed tower LDR <br />amendments, members still expressed a desire to regulate towers on <br />a case by case basis without specific regulations. <br />Issues/Constraints for the Board to Consider <br />*Legal <br />As with any change to the County's land development regulations, <br />there are legal issues to consider in developing new communications <br />tower regulations. With towers, however, there are even more <br />issues to consider than with general LDR changes. <br />The principal legal consideration with respect to enacting tower <br />regulations in the Telecommunications Act of 1996. Among its other <br />provisions, this act states that local governments: <br />• may not prohibit the provision of personal wireless services; <br />• may not discriminate among providers of functionally <br />equivalent personal wireless services; <br />• must base any denial decision on substantial competent <br />evidence. <br />To be valid and withstand any legal challenges, communications <br />tower regulations must allow a sufficient number of adequately <br />sized towers to meet the industry's needs. In limiting tower <br />location, height, design, or other factors, the Board must <br />establish justifiable standards that address specific issues <br />3 <br />NOVEMBER 13, 1996 aooK 99 PA�E 8�. <br />