My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11/26/1996
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1996
>
11/26/1996
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:06:10 PM
Creation date
6/17/2015 9:11:00 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
11/26/1996
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
55
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
� � r <br />which pertains to emergency permit issuance by local governments. Structures <br />must "have become damaged or vulnerable to damage from a subsequent frequent <br />coastal storm. " <br />"Vulnerable" is when an eligible structure is subject to either direct wave attack <br />or to erosion from a 15 -year return interval storm which exposes any portion of <br />the foundation." <br />ALTERNATIVES AND ANALYSIS <br />In analyzing the application received, staff has met in Tallahassee with DEP <br />Bureau of Beaches and Coastal Systems, conducted site visits with FDEP staff, <br />and reviewed the application for completeness and conformance with Florida <br />Statutes. FDEP staff has indicated that an emergency permit is recommended for <br />the applicant. The applicant's two primary dwelling foundations have been <br />exposed and are under direct wave attack. The applicant has proposed meeting <br />the five state requirements as follows: <br />a) Protection of Beach and Dune Sys - The applicant has stated that there <br />is "no dune to protect", however, the applicant is aware that the structure <br />is designed to minimize impacts to the beach dune system. Construction <br />will take place by placing and operating a crane seaward of the wall. Access <br />to the beach will be from the applicant's property. <br />b) Siting and Design Criteria for the Protective Structure - The applicant has <br />contracted Cangianelli Construction which has provided staff with design <br />drawings. A drawing showing the seawall location was submitted to the <br />FDEP for review. The structure will be as far landward as is practicable. <br />The sheet pile seawall with a concrete cap and deadman is adequate <br />structurally as designed by a structural engineer. <br />c) Impacts on Adjacent Properties - The applicant has stated "the property to <br />the south have already since many years secured their property with a <br />seawall," the Village Spires. As to the property to the north, which is a 350' <br />vacant lot, the applicant will construct a return wall 35' at 900 to the <br />shoreline. <br />d) Preservation of Public Beach Access - No public access frontage will be <br />influenced by the construction of the seawall. <br />e) Protection of Native Coastal Vegetation and Nesting Marine Turtles and <br />their Hatchlings - All coastal vegetation disturbed will be restored. As little <br />disturbance to vegetation as possible will occur. No work will be performed <br />during turtle nesting season. <br />County staff has contacted the City of Vero Beach for review. The City of Vero <br />Beach has suspended Chapter 75, Beach Maintenance & Preservation of the Vero <br />Beach Code of Ordinances and has no comments on the proposed construction. <br />(see attached correspondence from Mark Satterlee.) <br />RECOMMENDATIONS AND FUNDING <br />Staff recommends that a FS Chapter 161.085 (3) Emergency Permit be issued for <br />the Jelmby properties at this time subject to the following conditions: <br />21 <br />November 26, 1996 Boos 99 Fao;E 941 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.