My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11/26/1996
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1996
>
11/26/1996
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:06:10 PM
Creation date
6/17/2015 9:11:00 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
11/26/1996
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
55
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
and GE Credit. He predicted the project would be completed with <br />the most modern technology known in the industry. <br />Commissioner Eggert thanked them for the very clear <br />presentation. She explained the reason the County is purchasing <br />land near the landfill is for expansion of the landfill and that <br />the County has provided INRIVCO an opportunity to lease the land. <br />Mr. Knigin responded to several questions posed by <br />Commissioner Ginn concerning the participation of the Adler Group, <br />plans for organic conversion, steam generation and the amount of <br />waste stream necessary to make generating steam feasible. <br />Utility Services Director Terry Pinto expressed confidence in <br />the project whether it is developed by this company or another. He <br />did not feel waste stream would be a problem, that the people who <br />will utilize the project will rely on low-cost purchase of raw <br />material and their survival is based on the sale of the end <br />product. <br />Director Pinto reported that staff has been other than <br />delightful in their negotiations with Mr. Knigin in their effort to <br />get a fair deal. He stressed that the success of the project is <br />the elimination of greed on the part of any partner and everyone <br />involved needs to understand that. It is important to make sure <br />that everyone is happy when they leave the table. He has talked <br />with people all over the country about the project, and reported <br />that the whole process is being watched by others who are <br />interested. He emphasized that in order for the project to succeed <br />here, it must have the support of the community. <br />Commissioner Ginn asked if it might be possible to get a <br />conditional contract in an effort to get financing commitments, and <br />Mr. Knigin responded that Director Pinto and County Attorney <br />Vitunac are very tough negotiators and that an understanding has <br />not yet been reached. He also commented that lenders cannot commit <br />financing based on "ball park" figures, but require specific <br />information. He expected that negotiations would be moving more <br />swiftly now. <br />Commissioner Ginn was concerned that Director Pinto and County <br />Attorney Vitunac might need more help in negotiating, and <br />Administrator Chandler assured her that while they are the primary <br />negotiators, they receive input from him and other disciplines. <br />Commissioner Ginn strongly felt it would be better to have a <br />negotiating team which might consist of 2 county attorneys, the <br />Budget Director and the County Administrator as she believed there <br />is wisdom in many opinions. She also wanted a workshop after <br />November 26, 1996BooK 99 Fa�F9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.