Laserfiche WebLink
The proposed changes include the following: <br />Changing the preliminary plat approval timeframe from 18 <br />months to 5 years (still allowing for multi -phased <br />project approval), while continuing to allow preliminary <br />plat approval extension. <br />Requiring preliminary plat approval extension requests to <br />be -reviewed by the Planning and Zoning Commission rather <br />than by the Board of County Commissioners. <br />Establishing a review criterion for extension requests <br />and allowing conditions to be attached to extension <br />approvals. <br />In staff's opinion, the proposed changes will not result in <br />construction of projects that would be significantly <br />inconsistent with up-to-date standards, will allow for more <br />realistic flexibility for developer market timing, and will <br />grant the Planning and Zoning Commission authority to approve <br />extensions. Such involvement by the Planning and Zoning <br />Commission is logical, since it is the Commission that grants <br />approval of preliminary plats originally. <br />Recommendations: The Planning and Zoning Commission, PSAC, <br />and staff recommend approval of the proposed change. <br />2. Restatement of Special Setbacks for Utility Sheds. In a <br />previous LDR amendment, regulations for utility shed setbacks <br />were modified in zoning chapter section 911.15(2)(x). A <br />parallel section in the single-family development chapter <br />(Chapter 912) needs to be amended to be consistent with the <br />previous change made to 911.15(2)(K). Therefore, the change <br />is needed for consistency. <br />Recommendations: The Planning and Zoning Commission, PSAC, <br />and staff recommend approval of the proposed change. <br />3. Minor Revisions/Update of Handicap Parking Requirements. <br />Handicap parking requirements are correctly addressed in <br />section 954.07(2) of the off-street parking chapter. That <br />section is consistent with state handicap requirements, which <br />are backed by state and federal expertise on the subject of <br />handicap parking requirements. However, out-of-date handicap <br />parking requirements are currently contained in section <br />954.05(36) which references out-of-date handicap parking <br />standards for medical uses. Since the handicap requirements <br />in that section are inconsistent with state requirements and <br />section 954.07(2), the handicap requirements in section <br />954.05(36) should be deleted to be consistent with up-to-date <br />requirements. <br />Recommendations: The Planning and Zoning Commission, PSAC, <br />and staff recommend approval of the proposed change. <br />4. Clarification of Concurrency Criterion for Accessory Dwelling <br />Units. Accessory dwelling units, which are allowed in single <br />family residential areas as an administrative permit use, are <br />regulated by the specific land use criteria in section <br />971.41(10). One of the 12 listed criteria contains a <br />concurrency requirement that needs to be corrected to be <br />consistent with the current concurrency procedures of chapter <br />910. The proposed amendment makes the necessary correction. <br />Recommendations: The Planning and Zoning Commission, PSAC, <br />and staff recommend approval of the proposed change. <br />3 <br />DECEMBER 4, 1996 BOOK 99 pAcEI054 <br />