Laserfiche WebLink
FF,_ <br />BOOK 99 FnI0 55 <br />5. Referencing "Fueling Position" Rather Than "Pump". For years, <br />County staff has interpreted the traffic impact fee (TIF) <br />ordinance's "per pump" unit of measurement wording for gas <br />stations to mean "per fueling position". Staff's reasoning is <br />that Institute of Traffic Engineers (ITE) rates, which are the <br />basis for current gas station TIF rates, are based on fueling <br />positions rather than actual pump equipment configurations. <br />In a recent TIF assessment interpretation appeal, the County <br />Administrator agreed with staff and directed staff to clarify <br />the TIF ordinance to reference "per fueling position" rather <br />than "per fuel pump" unit of measurement for gas station TIF <br />rates. The proposed amendment does so. <br />Recommendations: The Planning and Zoning Commission, PSAC, <br />and staff recommend approval of the proposed change. <br />6. Car Washes in the CL District. Recently, Attorney Michael <br />O'Haire on behalf of Karl Hedin filed an LDR amendment <br />application to allow car washes as a permitted use in the CL <br />(Limited Commercial) district. The intent of the CL district, <br />stated in LDR section 911.10 (2)(e), is to allow restricted <br />commercial activities to accommodate convenience retail and <br />service needs of area residents. Over the last several years, <br />the Board of County Commissioners has approved LDR amendments <br />expanding CL uses to include limited automotive repair and <br />maintenance uses as well as personal self -storage uses. As <br />such, the county considers limited automotive services as <br />necessary to meet convenience needs of area residents. In <br />staff's opinion, it is consistent with currently allowed CL <br />district uses to allow car washes that do not involve repair <br />uses as a permitted use in the CL district. The proposed <br />amendment would allow "car washes (no repair uses)" as a <br />permitted use in the CL district. <br />Recommendations: The Planning and Zoning Commission, PSAC, <br />and staff recommend approval of the proposed change. <br />7. Wabasso Corridor Plan Codification. On November 21, 1995, the <br />Board of County Commissioners adopted the Wabasso Corridor <br />Plan which, among other things, established new "aesthetic <br />enhancement regulations" applicable to new development <br />projects within the corridor plan area (see attachment #3). <br />The Plan specified special development regulations addressing <br />several development project aspects, including: uses, free- <br />standing signs, roofs and basic architectural features, <br />colors, special screening, landscaping, buffering, task force <br />review opportunities, nonconformities, and variance <br />provisions. Although the Board's adoption of the plan put <br />these requirements into effect in November 1995, these <br />requirements need to be codified into the LDR's. The attached <br />amendment proposal does just that, establishing within the <br />LDRs special additional regulations for projects in the <br />corridor plan area. At its September 27, 1996 meeting, the <br />PSAC reviewed the proposed codification and suggested a few <br />clarifications. Those clarifications have been incorporated <br />into the proposed amendment. <br />Recommendations: The Planning and Zoning Commission, PSAC, <br />and staff recommend approval of the proposed change, which now <br />incorporates changes to the variance provisions section that <br />were recommended by the county attorney's office at the <br />October 24, 1996 Planning and Zoning Commission meeting. <br />4 <br />DECEMBER 4, 1996 <br />� � r <br />