My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12/10/1996
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1996
>
12/10/1996
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:06:10 PM
Creation date
6/8/2015 4:06:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
12/10/1996
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
33
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Fr- -7 <br />bra 9 F1l;E�0 <br />Chairman Adams was concerned that signage might draw attention <br />and attract people to dig there and disturb the artifacts. <br />The Board unanimously agreed with her concern. They briefly <br />discussed alternative suggestions such as using the Library or <br />Center for the Arts to display the historical artifacts. Also <br />mentioned was reserving the artifacts for a later display near <br />Jungle Trail in connection with the ISTEA program. <br />Commissioner Eggert and Commissioner Ginn felt the Library <br />would be ideal because of a program already in place on the Indian <br />tribes of this area and because that is where people would look for <br />information. <br />Commissioner Eggert pointed out that landscaping and soil <br />placement (to protect the midden) should be done prior to <br />construction and wanted that clearly understood as part of the <br />(first bullet) recommendation. <br />MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED BY <br />Commissioner Ginn, for discussion, to approve <br />staff's recommendation as set forth in the <br />memorandum. <br />Under discussion, Commissioner Ginn suggested that the <br />recommendation be changed to eliminate signage and to display the <br />artifacts in another location to be determined at a later date. <br />Discussion ensued and it was decided to change the wording to <br />"developer should NOT identify the location ... ". <br />Dean Luethje, an engineer with Carter Associates representing <br />Majestic Partners, asked for clarification on the elimination of <br />the signage and the location of the artifacts. <br />Commissioner Eggert suggested addition of "in the future <br />displays of certain retrieved artifacts and possible preparation of <br />a brochure will be done." <br />Mr. Luethje was concerned about the stewardship of the <br />artifacts, and Commissioner Macht felt they should be safeguarded <br />somewhere. <br />Chairman Adams proposed that Mr. DeBlois come back to the <br />Board with a recommendation after he confers with Mr. Luethje. <br />Mr. DeBlois thought it might be a good idea for the developer <br />to coordinate with the Indian River Historical Society to make <br />artifacts available for the Society's display. <br />Commissioner Ginn suggested they change the wording to "shall" <br />turn over any artifacts. <br />26 <br />December 10, 1996 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.