Laserfiche WebLink
Conditional concurrency review examines the available capacity of <br />each facility with respect to a proposed project. Since rezoning <br />requests are not projects, county regulations call for the <br />concurrency review to be based upon the most intense use of the <br />subject property based upon the requested zoning. For residential <br />rezoning requests, the most intense use (according to the County's <br />LDRs) is the maximum number of units that could be built on the <br />site, given the size of the property and the maximum density under <br />the proposed zoning. The site information used for the concurrency <br />analysis is as follows: <br />1. Size of Area to be Rezoned: <br />3. Existing Zoning District: <br />±19.9 acres <br />A-1, Agricultural District (up <br />to 1 unit/5 acres) <br />4. Proposed Zoning District: RM -8, Multiple -Family <br />Residential District (up to 8 <br />units/acre) <br />S. Most Intense Use of Subject Property <br />Under Existing Zoning District: 4 Single -Family Units <br />6. Most Intense Use of Subject Property <br />Under Proposed Zoning District: 159 Single -Family units <br />- Transportation <br />As part of the concurrency review process, the applicant has <br />submitted a Traffic Impact Statement (TIS). The county's Traffic <br />Engineering Division has reviewed and approved that TIS. A TIS <br />reports the number of peak hour/peak season/peak direction trips <br />that would be generated by the most intense use of' the subject <br />property under the proposed zoning district, and assigns those <br />trips to impacted roads. Impacted roads are defined in section <br />910.09(4)(b)3 of the county's LDRs as roadway segments which <br />receive five percent (5*) or more of the project traffic or fifty <br />(50) or more of the project trips, whichever is less. <br />According to the TIS, the existing level of service ("D" or better) <br />on impacted roadways would not be lowered by the traffic generated <br />by development of 159 single-family units on the subject property. <br />The table below 'identifies each of the impacted roadway segments <br />associated with a 159 unit single-family residential development on <br />the subject property. As indicated in this table, there is <br />sufficient capacity in all of the segments to accommodate the <br />projected traffic associated with the request. <br />TRAFFIC CONCURRENCY DETERMINATION <br />Impacted Road Segments <br />(peak hour/peak season/peak direction) <br />Roadway <br />Segment <br />Road <br />From <br />To <br />Segment <br />Capacity <br />LOS "D" <br />1920E <br />S.R. 60- — -- <br />-- 82nd Avenue <br />66th Avenue <br />3110 <br />1920W <br />S.R. 60 <br />82nd Avenue <br />66th Avenue <br />3110 <br />1925E <br />S.R. 60 <br />66th Avenue <br />58th Avenue <br />2840 <br />1925W <br />S.R. 60 <br />66th Avenue <br />58th Avenue <br />2840 <br />1930E <br />S.R. 60 <br />58th Avenue <br />43rd Avenue <br />2840 <br />1930W <br />S.R. 60 <br />58th Avenue <br />43rd Avenue <br />2840 <br />3010N <br />58th Avenue <br />4th Street <br />8th Street <br />760 <br />3010S <br />58th Avenue <br />4th Street <br />8th Street <br />760 <br />3015N <br />58th Avenue <br />8th Street <br />12th Street <br />760 <br />3015S <br />58th Avenue <br />8th Street <br />12th Street <br />760 <br />302ON <br />58th Avenue <br />12th Street <br />16th Street <br />880 <br />3020S <br />58th Avenue <br />12th Street <br />16th Street <br />880 <br />3025N <br />58th Avenue <br />16th Street <br />S.R. 60 <br />1890 <br />3025S <br />58th Avenue <br />16th Street <br />S.R. 60 <br />1890 <br />23 <br />January 21, 1997 <br />ROOK iuM FAGS20 9 <br />