Laserfiche WebLink
II <br />thing as my letter, with some minor changes to the "boiler -plate". Mr. Cangianelli <br />and I reviewed it and returned it on a timely basis. Then we got back an impressive <br />agreement that needs some face to face negotiation. We will be available to meet <br />with you at your convenience to discuss the document. As we discussed on the <br />telephone, we no longer need the use of the parking lot since our steel sheets have all <br />been installed and the balance of the cap work can be completed from the land side <br />of the seawall. We realize that the six homes to the north of us will still need to use <br />the lot for a period of time.We are prepared to take whatever steps are necessary to <br />uphold our end of the agreement. <br />I have enclosed letters from several people that were at the meeting on April 29, <br />1996 confirming in their own words their recollection of the meeting. I have also <br />included a letter from attorney Thomas Thomasello who was at the Tallahassee <br />conference with the DEP management and some copies of pictures relevant to the <br />Summerplace seawall height. <br />Please assure the Commissioners that we have done nothing intentionally to_ break <br />faith with them. We are ever thankful for them allowing us to protect our <br />homes .... and to you for your help and guidance. <br />Sinc 1 yours, <br />President <br />Summerplace Improvement Association, Inc. <br />Public Works Director Jim Davis advised that staff has <br />reviewed the video tape taken at Summerplace on April, 1996. At <br />that meeting, the major issue regarding the placement of the <br />seawall was the sea turtle nesting habitat. Staff feels that the <br />residents did act in good faith to move the seawall landward to <br />allow as much beach as possible. It was staff's feeling, after <br />that meeting that we would get a revision to the permit from the <br />property owners to allow a vertical increase in the height of the <br />wall. In addition, we understood that moving the wall back was the <br />preferred alignment of the DEP and we concurred with moving the <br />seawall landward as much as possible. Since that was necessary, <br />the vertical increase was necessary, so our recommendation at this <br />time is for the Board to approve the existing height of the <br />Summerplace seawall, which is a 2 -tier height. The first 3-4 homes <br />currently have a 4-6 ft. height because the sand has built up at <br />the toe of the wall. The wall does step up a few feet along the <br />northern eight homes. <br />Director Davis recalled that when the Board granted permission <br />to extend the seawall for another 6 homes two weeks ago, staff felt <br />the height of the wall should be predicated on the height of the <br />dune at that location. The height should rise where the dune rises <br />or the structures will not have good foundation support. We have <br />been working with the DEP and we feel there is harmony between the <br />FEBRUARY 11, 1997 43 <br />BOOK 5� FkGE ��e� <br />