My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2/27/1997
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1997
>
2/27/1997
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:10:03 PM
Creation date
6/17/2015 9:31:37 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Workshop Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
02/27/1997
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
39
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
developments have been built using the density bonus. She <br />concurred that the management issue is very important and submitted <br />there are ways for the government to be in control. She emphasized <br />that the "goal" is important as they can use particular incentives <br />depending on the particular goal. <br />Mr. Fleming commented regarding tying landscape to increased <br />density bonuses, and in Palm Beach County the planners went <br />exaction crazy. He believed there is a delicate balance and that <br />all the world's problems cannot be solved in one apartment complex. <br />Commissioner Tippin thanked the representatives for coming and <br />observed that Indian River County is probably one of the "late <br />bloomers" in affordable housing developments because it had been <br />the goal for many years to keep the county "low density/green <br />space". Now, however, low density/green space is being construed <br />as "urban sprawl". He felt that housing cannot be separated from <br />economic development because he sees workers going south every day, <br />taking their pay checks with them to another county. He would like <br />to see those dollars spent in Indian River County. <br />Commissioner Ginn appreciated the presentations, felt they <br />were enlightening and educational. She commented that some prior <br />population growth projections have been incorrect and wondered how <br />the figures are determined. <br />Mr. O'Dell advised that projections are based on extrapolation <br />of historical trends. He explained that they utilize the Bureau of <br />Economic and Business Research County Level projects as a <br />beginning. <br />Commissioner Ginn pointed out that the County is not giving <br />income tax credits as well as density bonuses. Now, developers <br />appear before the Value Adjustment Board requesting reduction in ad <br />valorem taxes. She wondered how much do you have to give a <br />developer; she felt income tax credits should be sufficient. <br />Ms. Leigh explained in detail the complicated process and <br />pointed out that rents are lower than market rate and, therefore, <br />restrict the development's cash flow. <br />Commissioner Ginn commented on the Affordable Housing <br />Commission report in the backup, the public's fears of <br />deterioration of an area, and NIMBY -ism (not -in -my -backyard). She <br />was not sure our need for additional affordable housing is as great <br />as has been stated, cited newspaper advertising, and felt that a <br />market analysis was necessary. She questioned how the programs are <br />addressing the needs in the state and wondered what would happen 15 <br />years down the road when Indian River Apartments and Kyle's Run are <br />no longer affordable. <br />35 <br />February 27, 1997 bw 1 U ��� � �� <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.