My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2/27/1997
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1997
>
2/27/1997
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:10:03 PM
Creation date
6/17/2015 9:31:37 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Workshop Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
02/27/1997
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
39
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
BOOK <br />Chairman Eggert asked if you can take a transfer of densities <br />with affordable housing to demand more landscaping, either in a <br />regular density bonus or transfer of wetlands. <br />Attorney Collins thought if there are compatibility issues, <br />and you want to have an enhanced or enlarged buffer between a <br />project that has a density bonus and one beside it that does not, <br />you can do it through the LDR's. However, you must be aware that <br />as you increase the buffers, you condense the units within the <br />remaining building envelope and you may run into the pressures of <br />the height limits or other regulations. <br />Director Keating thought, with respect to River Park Place, <br />that because we require density bonus and density transfer <br />allowances to go through the Planned Development process, we have <br />a lot more control there and we have the ability to get some of <br />those things. He thought it might be helpful for some of the <br />speakers to speak about density impacts on other projects in other <br />local governments. <br />Ms. Leigh advised the original intent was to have local <br />government provide about 10% of the equity in some way. It could <br />be provided in any way that would quantify to reduce the actual <br />cost per unit. She recalled several of the original ideas to <br />provide this 10% equity. <br />In response to Commissioner Ginn's question, Director Keating <br />advised that a density bonus is not required or necessary, but when <br />considered as part of the whole and under some of the programs, an_ <br />incentive such as a density bonus can be given',or some other <br />incentive must be given. <br />Mr. Fleming pointed out that balancing the quality of life <br />issue with the need for creating financial affordability is <br />important. He spoke on the competing environmental issues, <br />increasing densities in areas, decisions on protecting the <br />environment, and concerns for payment of infrastructure. He <br />introduced Jodi Glass, as the "architect of density bonus program" <br />who was in the audience. <br />Jodi Glass, now working with the Richmond Group, the developer <br />of Kyle's Run, formerly with the Palm Beach County Planning <br />Division, who has also worked with the Commission on Affordable <br />Housing, explained the creation of the density bonus program in <br />Palm Beach County and pointed out the benefits to both the county <br />and the developer. She agreed the density bonus program is scary, <br />but that it is a very valuable tool when used correctly because it <br />does not attack the dollars in the county's budget. She stressed <br />there are reams of information in Palm Beach County and many <br />34 <br />February 27, 1997 <br />a s <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.