Laserfiche WebLink
I 1� <br />�o <br />- �rl INA <br />the interchange appearance, a ±350' lattice tower could not be <br />screened from view. In staff's opinion, the county should inform <br />the state that the county does not accept the interchange site and <br />that the state should allow more time to find an acceptable, <br />alternative site. If further efforts to arrange for an alternative <br />site fail, then the county could provide the state with "approval", <br />subject to specific aesthetic improvements along I-95. <br />Staff recommends that the Board respond to the Department of <br />Management Services with a letter stating that Indian River County <br />does not approve of the I-95/CR 512 interchange location and will <br />continue to work with all parties involved to find an acceptable, <br />alternative site not located at a major entranceway to the county. <br />Rick Rewiski of the Department of Management Services, State <br />of Florida, land acquisition agent, wanted to be sure that a <br />location at I-95 or west of there would be agreeable to the Board. <br />Their tower will cover the majority of the County and is very <br />important to their system. One of their requirements is that they <br />must be able to receive over a range of up to 10 miles into the <br />ocean for the marine patrol. <br />Mr. Rewiski continued that Indian River County is in Phase II <br />of their project and the County's law enforcement communications <br />will be affected. <br />Commissioner Adams suggested that the DEP property west of I- <br />95 would be another alternative. <br />ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED by <br />Commissioner Macht, the Board unanimously approved a <br />letter from the Chairman stating that the County <br />does not approve of the I-95/CR-512 interchange <br />location and will continue to work with all parties <br />involved to find an acceptable, alternative site not <br />located at a major entranceway to the County, as <br />recommended by staff. <br />PAVING AND DRAINAGE IMPROVE IENrS - 101ST AVENUE <br />BETWEEN 791M STREET AND 87TH STREET - VERO LAKES <br />ESTATES <br />The Board reviewed a Memorandum of April 2, 1997: <br />TO: James Cbandler <br />County Administrator <br />/ 1 <br />THROUGH: James W. Davis, P <br />Public Works Director / <br />;, <br />and <br />f� <br />Roger D. Cain, P.E. �"/County <br />Engineer <br />FROM: Michelle A. Gentile, CET <br />Civil Engineer <br />SUBJECT: Resolutions to Provide for the Paving and Drainage Improvements to and set <br />Public Hearing date for. <br />101st Avenue between 79th Street and 87th Street in Vero Lake Estates <br />Subdivision <br />DATE: April 2, 1997 <br />APRIL 15, 1997 18 <br />� a � <br />