My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
6/10/1997
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1997
>
6/10/1997
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:10:04 PM
Creation date
6/17/2015 10:12:40 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
06/10/1997
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
66
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
working at cross purposes. It seemed to her that if we worked at the part of the equation we <br />would be a lot further ahead. Her other concern was the selection of the committee members and <br />the criteria. <br />Commissioner Adams asked how it was that Palm Beach County ended up with 8 <br />members and the other three counties had 5 each, and Mr. Busha remarked that Palm Beach <br />County had asked the same question, "How come we have only 8, when we have a million <br />people?" The representation numbers were based on population. <br />Commissioner Adams countered that the money is coming from a grant, one county is <br />not giving any more than any other county, so she did not see that one county should have any <br />more representatives than any other county. She could see it if they contributed more money. <br />Her other concern had to do with the meeting place because Indian River County was quite a <br />distance from Stuart and it was difficult for people to make the journey. <br />Mr. Busha thought the OEDP could be rotated to the different counties, so that everyone <br />is not completely inconvenienced every meeting. <br />Commissioner Adams felt that all four counties already had very strong economic <br />development councils already working, and the offer would merely coordinate, but it would still <br />involve county staff to furnish information. She felt there were other sources of loans. She had <br />mixed emotions that maybe this was just another bureaucratic layer to find a niche to qualify to <br />fund another staff member. She was not convinced that it was necessary. <br />Commissioner Ginn agreed that this might turn out to be another layer of bureaucracy. <br />She had to wonder if the benefits to Indian River County are worth the involvement. We are <br />unique and have a unique lifestyle here. We want economic development, but we have an idea <br />of what we'd like, and we're not really in sync with some of the other counties to the south. <br />Also, there is likely to be competition in numbers. <br />Commissioner Tippin did not want to risk tampering with what is now in place with the <br />Chamber of Commerce's efforts, plus he was not in favor of adding this to what the regional <br />planning council needs to be about. <br />Commissioner Macht commented this is the age of devolution as defined by the Congress <br />on down, which means we are restoring the authority that has been usurped from local <br />governments over the years. He thought Indian River County had no business going in the <br />opposite direction. <br />ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY Commissioner <br />Macht, the Board unanimously and respectfully declined the invitation to <br />join the Regional Overall Economic Development Program Committee. <br />51 <br />June 10, 1997 <br />ECnr .� <br />-� L FAGE 7J <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.