My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10/7/1997
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1997
>
10/7/1997
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:10:20 PM
Creation date
6/17/2015 10:15:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
10/07/1997
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
131
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
BACKGROUND. <br />Several months ago, county staff began working with the state to develop an acceptable way of <br />accommodating the I-95 corridor communications needs of various state agencies, including the <br />Division of Communications, and FDOT's call box system. Originally, the state proposed erecting <br />two new towers along I-95: a *3501 tower at the CR 512/1-95 interchange and a * 150' tower at the <br />SR 60/1-95 interchange. In March and April of this year, the Board agreed with staff <br />recommendations and requested that the state not site the towers at the interchanges and that the <br />state work with county staff to find alternative sites located away from major entranceways to the <br />county. <br />Since that time, staff has worked with the state on various alternative north and south county sites. <br />The state has now finalized revised plans that are acceptable to county staff. Therefore staff requests <br />the Board's concurrence with the state's plans, with conditions. <br />ANALYSIS• <br />As previously reported to the Board, the county has no regulatory authority over the state siting <br />towers within the state's right-of-way. However, the state has agreed to work with the county and <br />to respect the county's wishes to keep towers away from the high profile I-95 interchanges that <br />function as major entranceways to the county. The state's final plans are as follows: <br />•North County <br />No new state tower will be erected in northern Indian River County. Instead, a new 300' tower will <br />be erected in southern Brevard County at I-95 and the C54 Canal. Also, an antenna for the state <br />Division of Communications will be attached to the existing 300' tall American Tower Systems tower <br />located southeast of Fellsmere. Such collocation is encouraged by the county, and has already been <br />permitted via a staff -approved administrative approval site plan, pursuant to the county's new tower <br />regulations. <br />*South County <br />In lieu of a tower at the I-95/SR 60 interchange, a new 201' tower will be located 2 miles further <br />south, on the west side of I-95 where it crosses 90th Avenue. The FAA (Federal Aviation <br />Administration) has determined that the tower will not exceed FAA obstruction standards and will <br />not be a hazard to air navigation. The tower will be located within state controlled right-of-way, far <br />from any existing homes and west of I-95 where county zoning and tower regulations allow towers <br />over 150' tall in the A-2 agricultural zoning district. As requested by stat y dual lighting is to be <br />provided with white strobe lighting during the day and red pulse lighting at night. <br />Also, consistent with county tower requirements, the state has agreed to preserve and provide <br />landscape muning around the equipment building that will be located at the base of the tower. Staff <br />Will coordinate with FDOT's environmental division to determine species and placement of <br />supplemental landscaping. <br />In stag's opinion, the state's final plans meet the county's previously stated objective of keeping new <br />state towers away from the I-95 interchanges. Although the south county tower will be located next <br />to I-95, it will be located in an area far from any existing homes, in an area where towers over 150' <br />tall are approvable under the county's new tower regulations, and it will be consistent with the <br />county's tower lighting and landscape screening requirements. <br />RECOMMENDATION: <br />Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners concur with staff that the state's final I- <br />95 corridor tower and antenna plans are acceptable, with a condition that the I-95/90th Avenue tower <br />be provided with day/night dual lighting and landscape screening around the equipment building. <br />ON MOTION by Commissioner Ginn, SECONDED by <br />Commissioner Tippin, the Board, by a 4-0 vote (Commissioner <br />Macht absent) unanimously concurred with staff that the State's <br />final I-95 corridor tower and antenna plans are acceptable, with a <br />condition that the I-95/90' Avenue tower be provided with <br />day/night dual lighting and landscape screening around the <br />equipment building, pursuant to staffs recommendations. <br />OCTOBER 7, 1997 <br />91 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.