Laserfiche WebLink
deny the special exception use request. In making its decision, the Board must determine if the <br />request is appropriate for the subject property and surrounding areas. The Board may then grant <br />approval and attach any condition(s) and safeguard(s) deemed appropriate to mitigate impacts and <br />to ensure compatibility of the use with surrounding areas. <br />Planned Development Special Exception Use Analysis: <br />1. Density Bonus: The applicant is proposing a 9.1% density increase in the project's normally <br />allowed maximum density using the affordable housing density bonus available through the <br />PD process. A density increase of 20% is allowed through the PD special exception process. <br />The total number of units allowed on the property is as follows: <br />15.41 X 10 unitstacre = 154.1 units <br />154.1 X.2 = 30.82 affordable housing density bonus units <br />154.1 + 30.82 = 184.92 or 184 units allowed <br />Allowable Density with Bonus = 11.94 units per acre (184 -units) <br />Proposed Density with Bonus = 10.90 units per acre (168 units) <br />Pursuant to zoning chapter section 911.14(4) (see attachment #4), the applicant has requested <br />an affordable housing density bonus of 9.1%. The applicant is providing affordable housing <br />through the Low Income Housing Tax Credit Program administered by the Florida Housing <br />Finance Agency (FHFA). Under that program, the applicant is required to keep all of the <br />units affordable for a 15 year period. For rental projects, affordable is defined in the county's <br />LDRs as a project having a monthly rental equal to .083 times 20% of the non -adjusted <br />annual median family income for Indian River County as established by the FHFA. <br />Satisfaction of the tax credit program requirements will satisfy county affordable housing <br />density bonus requirements. Based on the proposed PD and proposed program participation, <br />staff has determined that the applicant meets county requirements for a 20% density bonus. <br />To ensure that these requirements will be met, the applicant will need to provide the county <br />with a letter from the state or federal agency responsible for funding and monitoring the <br />project. In addition, the applicant will need to record a restrictive deed covenant in the public <br />records. The covenant will specify the terms of the affordable housing approval, and will <br />place any prospective buyer of the project on notice as to the terms of approval. <br />2. Buffer Requirements: Residential Planned Developments (PD) are required to provide a 25' <br />building setback from the perimeter of the PD to all buildings, driveways, roadways, and <br />parking areas within the boundaries of the project. The conceptual plan provides the required <br />25' PD building setback Based on the land use designation of adjacent properties bordering <br />a PD project, additional landscaping and buffering may be required. Since the project is <br />adjacent to properties having a medium density residential land use designation, the <br />compatibility standards for PD developments do not require a buffer, other than the 25' <br />building setback. However, pursuant to the general zoning regulations, where multi -family <br />projects abut single firmily zoning, which is the case along this project's southwest comer, an <br />intervening landscape buffer shall be provided. In this case, the normal LDR requirement <br />gives the developer the option of providing either a Type "C" buffer with a 3' opaque feature <br />or a Type "D" buffer with a 6' opaque feature. However, the Planning and Zoning <br />Commission has recommended (with staff concurring) that, along the project's southern <br />perimeter that abuts single family parcels, the developer shall provide a 6' opaque feature with <br />either a Type "C" or Type "D" buffer. <br />The county is currently in the process of revising portions of the LDR landscaping regulations <br />which include enhanced landscaping requirements for projects along arterial and collector <br />roadways. The Board has invoked the pending ordinance doctrine and instructed staff to <br />apply the proposed standards. Since the subject site fronts a collector roadway (49th Street), <br />the developer is required to provide perimeter landscaping consistent the pending ordinance. <br />Along the project's 49th Street frontage, the developer will provide one tree for each 25' of <br />roadway frontage and a continuous hedge. <br />3. Compatibility: With the exception of three larger, deep parcels containing single family <br />homes located along the subject site's southern boundaries, the site is bordered by large <br />parcels zoned RM -10 that are either developed as multi -family apartments or can be <br />developed as multi -family projects at densities allowed in the RM -10 district. To the west of <br />the subject site are two existing apartment projects with a combined total of 154 units. <br />Victory Park, immediately to the west of the subject site, contains 100 units at a density of <br />9.1 units per acre. To the east is a 5 acre vacant parcel zoned RM -10. Opposite the subject <br />site on the north side of 49th Street are 152 acres of pasture land zoned A 1 with a land use <br />designation of L-2. <br />OCTOBER 7, 1997 <br />b <br />am M <br />