My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10/21/1997
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1997
>
10/21/1997
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:10:20 PM
Creation date
6/17/2015 10:18:42 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
10/21/1997
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
99
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MOO 103 FxEi3o <br />The goals, objectives and policies are the most important parts of the comprehensive plan. Policies <br />are statements in the plan which identify the actions which the county will take in order to direct the <br />community's development. As courses of action committed to by the county, policies provide the <br />basis for all county land development decisions. While all comprehensive plan policies are <br />important, some have more applicability than others in reviewing rezoning requests. Of particular <br />applicability for this request are the following objectives and policies. <br />Future Land Use Element Objective 1 <br />Future Land Use Element Objective 1 states that the county will have a compact land use pattern <br />which reduces urban sprawl. By increasing the density of land currently within the urban service <br />area, as opposed to expanding the urban service area, the county can efficiently support growth <br />without creating urban sprawl or sacrificing compactness. For these reasons, the request is <br />consistent with Future Land Use Element Objective 1. <br />Future Land Use Element Policy 1.13 <br />Future Land Use Element Policy 1.13 states that the M-1, Medium -Density Residential -1, land use <br />designation is intended for residential uses with densities up to 8 units/acre. In addition, that policy <br />states that these residential uses must be located within the urban service area <br />Since the subject property is located within an area designated as M-1 on the county's future land <br />use plan map and is located within the county's urban service area, and the proposed Zoning district <br />would permit residential uses no grater than the 8 units/acre permitted by the M-1 designation, the <br />proposed request is consistent with Policy 1.13. <br />Future Land Use Element Objective 4, Policy 2.5, and Policies 4.1- 4.4. <br />This objective and these policies all involve encouraging and concentrating development within the <br />urban service area. Growth patterns, as well as the comprehensive plan, indicate that the area around <br />the subject property will eventually be dominated by urban uses. By converting the subject property <br />from an agricultural to an urban zoning district, the county would encourage efficient use of land <br />within the urban service area For that reason, the proposed request implements Future Land Use <br />Element Objective 4, Policy 2.5, and Policies 4.1-4.4. <br />As part of its consistency analysis, staff compared the proposed request to all the objectives and <br />policies in the plan and found no conflicts. Therefore, the request is consistent with the <br />comprehensive plan. <br />Staffs position is that granting the request to rezone the subject property to RS -3 will result in <br />development which will be compatible with surrounding areas. <br />Land to the west of the subject property, which is zoned A-1 and RS -1, is used primarily for <br />residential purposes. Additionally, land to east of the subject property, which is zoned A-1, is used <br />partially for residential purposes. For that reason, development under the proposed zoning district <br />will be compatible with those properties. <br />To the north of the property are lands zoned RMH-8. These lands are used for a mobile home park. <br />The proposed zoning for the subject property will act as a transitional zoning district between the <br />RMH-8 zoning district and the A-1 zoning district. <br />Although there are groves south of the site, several factors work to mitigate potential <br />incompatibilities between those properties. The first factor is the 50 feet of physical separation <br />provided by the 8th Street road right-of-way. Additionally, there is a vegetative buffer located south <br />of 8th Street, between the subject property and the grove. <br />With respect to zoning, the county's policy has always been to retain agricultural Zoning on property <br />rather than changing it when the underlying land use designation increases. This not only reflects <br />the county's policy of using agricultural Zoning as a "holding" category, but also recognizes that <br />urbanization occurs incrementally with various tracts remaining agricultural for longer periods. <br />Two factors indicate that urban type zoning districts would be appropriate for this portion of the <br />county. The first factor is the underlying designation on the future land use map. This area is within <br />the urban service area and is deemed appropriate for residential development with densities of up <br />to 8 units/acre, among the highest densities allowed by the plan. _ <br />OCTOBER 21, 1997 <br />50 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.