Laserfiche WebLink
M <br />at the termination of streets, the perimeter of the neighborhood center, or the frontage along <br />a designated main street of a neighborhood or adjacent thoroughfare plan road. <br />Policy 18.2: The county shall provide incentives to develop Traditional Neighborhood Design <br />projects within the urban service area. Those incentives shall include, but not be limited to, the <br />following: <br />• 10% density bonus for TND projects located entirely within the urban service area; <br />• reduced building setback requirements; <br />• reduced lot size requirements; <br />• increased maximum impervious surface limits for individual lots; <br />• reduced right-of-way and travel lane widths; <br />• reduced comer radii requirements; and <br />• reduced off-street parking requirements. <br />Policy 18-3: To facilitate TND projects east of I-95 that are partially outside but adjacent to the <br />urban service area, 1Oand to continue to preserve the agricultural and natural character <br />and function of the area, the county shall allow portions of TND projects to be located outside of the <br />urban service area. No more tliai 25% A minimum of 60% of the total iroject density number of <br />residential -units shall be derived from the nortion of the roiect located outside within -the urban <br />service area. <br />Density shall be calculated and allowed based upon: <br />• the land use designation underlying the portion of the project within the urban service area; <br />• 1 unit/acre for project property located outside of the urban service area; and <br />• a density bonus up to 10% for projects located entirely within the urban service area. <br />Director Keating advised of a suggested change to the Goal on Page 70 that resulted <br />from a meeting with Commissioner Ginn the previous day. It would say: "Land development <br />in Indian River County will occur in an orderly and controlled manner which ensures <br />balanced growth <br />in order <br />to optimize <br />the <br />potential for economic <br />development, provides <br />for the efficient use <br />of facilities <br />and <br />services and ensures the <br />protection of the county's rich and varied environmental resources". <br />Director Keating pointed out one other policy change on Page 85, Policy 1.37, which <br />goes along with the hospital node expansion and is location specific for that area north of the <br />proposed expansion. It would allow some office use in an M-1 area and limit it to 20% of <br />that area. <br />Commissioner Tippin noted that on page 20, under Conservation, it said: <br />19 <br />OCTOBER 29, 1997 <br />SOUK 103 PAGE 263 <br />