My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11/4/1997
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1997
>
11/4/1997
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:10:20 PM
Creation date
6/17/2015 10:22:46 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
11/04/1997
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
109
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The site is bounded on the west by 661 Avenue. Classified as an urban minor arterial roadway on <br />the future roadway thoroughfare plan map, this segment of 66' Avenue is a two-lane unpaved road <br />with approximately 50 feet of public road right-of-way. No improvements are scheduled for the <br />portion of 66t° Avenue between Oslo Road and SW 131 Street. <br />The site is bounded on the north by Oslo Road Classified as an urban principal arterial roadway on <br />the future roadway thoroughfare plan map, this segment of Oslo Road is a two-lane road with <br />approximately 60 feet of public road right-of-way. The Indian River County MPO 1997 List of <br />Priority Projects indicates that the segment of Oslo Road between 2r Avenue and 82nd Avenue will <br />be expanded by two lanes in the time period between 2001-2005. <br />In this section, an analysis of the reasonableness of the land use amendment request will be <br />presented Specifically, this analysis will address: <br />• concurrency of public facilities; <br />• consistency with the county's comprehensive plan; <br />• compatibility with the surrounding area; and <br />• potential impact on environmental quality. <br />This site is located outside of the county Urban Service Area; therefore, the property is not suited <br />for urban scale development. Regardless, the Comprehensive Plan establishes minimum <br />development standards for. Transportation, Potable Water, Wastewater, Solid Waste, Drainage and <br />Recreation (Future Land Use Policy 3.1). The adequate provision of these services is necessary to <br />ensure the continued quality of life enjoyed by the community. The Comprehensive Plan and Land <br />Development Regulations (LDRs) require that new development be reviewed to ensure that the <br />minimum acceptable standards for these services and facilities are maintained. <br />Policy 3.2 of the Future Land Use Element states that no development shall be approved unless it <br />is consistent with the concurrency management system component of the Capital Improvements <br />EIement. For Comprehensive Plan amendment requests, conditional concurrency review is required. <br />Conditional concurrency review examines the available capacity of each facility with respect to a <br />proposed project Since Comprehensive Plan amendment requests are not projects, county <br />regulations call for the concurrency review to be based upon the most intense use of the subject <br />property based upon the requested zoning. For residential Comprehensive Plan amendment <br />requests, the most intense use (according to the County's LDRs) is the maximum number of units <br />that could be built on the site, given the size of the property and the maximum density under the <br />proposed zoning. The site information used for the concurrency analysis is as follows: <br />1. Size of Area to be Redesignated: <br />2. Existing Land Use Designation: <br />3. Proposed Land Use Designation: <br />4. Most Intense Use of Subject Property <br />Under Current Land Use Designation: <br />*18.8 acres <br />AG -1, Agricultural -1(up to 1 unit/5 acres) <br />M-1, Medium Density Residential - 1 (up to 8 <br />units/acre) <br />3 Single -Family Units <br />5. Most Intense Use of Subject Property <br />Under Proposed Land Use Designation: 150 Single -Family Units <br />Transportation <br />A review of the traffic impacts that would result from the development of the property indicates that <br />the existing level of service "D" or better on Oslo Road and other impacted roads would not be <br />lowered The site information used for determining traffic impacts is shown in table 1. <br />NOVEMBER 4, 1997 51 <br />BOOK 103 PAGE 347 <br />L <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.