My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11/4/1997
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1997
>
11/4/1997
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:10:20 PM
Creation date
6/17/2015 10:22:46 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
11/04/1997
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
109
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Fr- -I <br />BOOK 103 PAGE354 <br />This Comprehensive Plan amendment request will lead to the type of development described in the <br />previous paragraphs. An M-1 land use designation would permit up to 150 single-family residential <br />units on the subject property. Indian River County has not planned for intense development of that <br />nature in the part of the county where the subject property is located. Further, development of that <br />nature would be an invasion into an area dominated by agricultural uses, which is a major industry <br />in the county. <br />Future Land Use Policy 1.1 <br />Policy 1.1 requires Indian River County to adopt the Future Land Use Map. This trap illustrates the <br />land use designation pattern for the entire county. Approximately 33,720 acres of Indian River <br />County are designated for residential land uses according to the Future Land Use Map. <br />A residential allocation ratio (RAR) compares the number of residential units allowed by the Future <br />Land Use Map during a certain time period to the number of residential units needed daring that time <br />period. Along with historic land use patterns and other factors, an RAR can be a useful tool to <br />determine the county's residential land use needs. Comparing the expected need with the existing <br />acreage of residentially designated land, Indian River County has an RAR of 4.48. A 4.48 RAR <br />indicates that the county currently has more than four times the amount of residentially designated <br />land needed to accommodate the county's population in 2010. <br />Based on existing conditions, as well as existing population growth patterns, designating the subject <br />property M-1 would be premature. Indian River County's RAR indicates that a need does not exist <br />to redesignate the subject property to M-1. <br />Future Land Use Policy 1.13 <br />This policy states that "the Medium -Density Residential Land Use Designations are intended for <br />areas which are suitable for urban scale development and intensities." Policy 1.13 Rather states that <br />"these districts shall be located within the Urban Service Area." <br />Staffs position is that, currently, the subject property is not suitable for urban scale development and <br />intensity. As mentioned in the Descriptions and Conditions section, wastewater service is currently <br />not available to the subject property. Also mentioned in the Descriptions and Conditions section is <br />that the subject property is not in the Urban Service Area of Indian River County, nor is the subject <br />property contiguous to the Urban Service Area. In fact, the nearest Urban Service Area boundary <br />is more than a half mile from the subject property: Medium -Density Residential Use Designations <br />shall only be located within the Urban Service Area of the county. <br />Future Land Use Objective 2 and Policies 2.1, 2.2, and 2.5 <br />Objective 2, as well as policies 2.1, 2.2, and 2.5, relate to the Urban Service Area of Indian River <br />County. Objective 2 states that all new residential development greater than 2 umts/acre shall occur <br />within the Urban Service Area, which contains the infrastructure and services needed to <br />accommodate such development. Policy 2.1 references the map that Indian River County has <br />adopted to depict the Urban Service Area. Policy 2.2 describes the type of areas that are included <br />in the Urban Service Area Finally, Policy 2.5 indicates that Indian River County will encourage and <br />direct growth into the Urban Service Area through various regulations. <br />The proposed Comprehensive Plan amendment would permit densities of up to 8 units per acre on <br />the subject property. Density levels of up to 8 units per acre are not permitted outside the Urban <br />Service Area as indicated in Objective 2 of the Future Land Use Element and, as the Future Land <br />Use Map illustrates, the subject property is outside the Urban Service Area <br />The subject property is not contiguous to the existing Urban Service Area and cannot be included <br />in the Urban Service Area. These areas do not contain the services deemed necessary to support <br />development in an urban or suburban setting at levels identified in the Comprehensive Plan. <br />Therefore, having an M-1 land use designation on the subject property would not be appropriate. <br />In June 1993, the county initiated a request to amend the Comprehensive Plan by enlarging the <br />Urban Service Area to include land along both sides of Oslo Road from 58th Avenue to 74th Avenue, <br />which incorporates the northern portion of the Bessemer property, and to change the land use from <br />AG -1 (up to 1 unit/5 acres) to R, Rural (up to 1 unit/acre). The request was submitted based upon <br />the results of a staff study. That study, mandated by Future Land Use Policy 1.37, addressed the <br />issue of utility lines located in road rights-of-way, where the subject roads serve as Urban Service <br />Area boundaries. Through that study, staff determined that the Urban Service Area boundary could <br />be expanded to include a half mile wide strip (a quarter mile on each side) along the segment of Oslo <br />Road, between 58th Avenue and 74th Avenue. The request was denied by the Board of County <br />Commissioners. The basis of the Board of County Commissioners' decision was that the county did <br />not need any additional residentially designated lands and that expansion of the Urban Service Area <br />NOVEMBER 4, 1997 58 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.