Laserfiche WebLink
M M <br />was premature. In their decision, the Board of County Commissioners directed staff to revise the <br />appropriate policies of the Comprehensive Plan to allow properties adjacent to and up to 500 feet <br />from the Urban Service Area to connect to county potable water and sanitary sewer services. <br />While the referenced objectives and policies are particularly applicable to this request, other <br />comprehensive plan policies and objectives also have relevance. For that reason, staff evaluated the <br />subject request for consistency with all plan policies and objectives. Based upon that analysis, staff <br />determined that the request is not consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. <br />Staffs position is that granting the request to redesignate the subject property to M-1 will result in <br />development that will be incompatible with surrounding areas. <br />All lands surrounding the subject property are designated AG -1. In fact, the AG -1 designation is <br />contiguous for at least a half mile in all directions from the subject property. For that reason, <br />development under the proposed land use designation will be incompatible with the surrounding <br />area. <br />Agriculture is one of the major industries in the county. Based on the amount of land designated for <br />agriculture, the revenue generated and the number of employees, one of the most important resources <br />of the county to be preserved is agricultural land. This Comprehensive Plan amendment request is <br />an encroachment into an area dominated by agricultural production. <br />Active agricultural operations involve noise, odors, and spraying, all of which have major adverse <br />impacts on residential development. As a result, grove owners may need to eliminate aerial <br />spraying, limit the hours of ground spraying, relocate pumps, and reduce other impacts. Also, <br />residential development adversely impacts agriculture by increasing incidences of trespassing, <br />vandalism, and carribbean fruit fly host plants. <br />Buffer regulations have been established to mitigate these impacts in areas where residential <br />development is adjacent to active agricultural uses. These buffer requirements would not be as <br />effective for residential development on the subject property. In this case, the subject property is <br />surrounded by active agricultural operations in all directions. Therefore, it is more likely that <br />pesticides, herbicides, and fertilizer will drift over the subject property and that offensive odors and <br />noises will be more intense. <br />For these reasons, residential development of the subject property would be incompatible with <br />surrounding areas. <br />Being a citrus grove, the site has been cleared Since it contains no environmentally important land, <br />such as wetlands or sensitive uplands, development of the site is anticipated to have little or no <br />impact on environmental quality. For this reason, no adverse environmental impacts associated with <br />this request are anticipated <br />Under the current land use designation, the subject property can be developed for residential uses <br />while protecting agricultural uses of the area Policy 5.8 of the Future Land Use Element of the <br />Comprehensive Plan allows for planned development (PD) projects in agriculturally designated areas <br />of the county. Agricultural PDs permit the normally allowable residential density on agriculturally <br />designated land to be clustered into a small area of the project, on building lots no greater than 1 acre <br />in size. The remainder of the project area is preserved as agricuultural, conservation, and/or <br />recreational open space. In that way, agricultural lands and open spaces are preserved in large. <br />contiguous areas in a manner that preserves agricultural character and functionality. Agricultural <br />PDs are encouraged by the county, since these developments preserve open space, agricultural uses, <br />and the rural character of certain areas of the county such as the area in which the subject property <br />is located. <br />Another alternative, the mixed use land use designation, could be applied to the subject property. <br />Policy 1.34 defines a mixed use land use designation as a PD project which clusters residential and <br />non-residential uses in a manner which protects agricultural and open space areas, protects natural <br />resources, creates a self-sufficient community, minimizes off-site traffic, and does not increase urban <br />sprawl. Policy 1.33 of the Future Land Use Element references certain requirements that are to be <br />met in order to apply a mixed use land use designation on a property. One such requirement to <br />establish a mixed use designation is that if the subject property is one mile or less from the Urban <br />NOVEMBER 4, 1997 59 <br />BOOK 103 PAGE 33 <br />L <br />