Laserfiche WebLink
Burton & Associates <br />Indian River County <br />AND COLLECTION <br />Utilities Department Water, Wastewater & Sludge Rate Study <br />PROJECT CONCEPT <br />SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS <br />CAPITAL PROJECTS <br />o EFFLUENT REUSE R.were <br />m: <br />T�T�NT +T <br />SYS EMREOUW� I <br />NALYSIS OF ERU <br />7-s,NMENrToc LAND USE <br />UNRESTRICTED <br />CASH <br />gE�gyEg <br />TREATMENT PLANT <br />o WATER Fa: W.W. WeWwaW. <br />AND COLLECTION <br />0 WASTEWATER E6hrrq R.uy <br />SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS <br />o EFFLUENT REUSE R.were <br />o R&R Lw.: 0 AM E)pmw <br />Lep: E—" 0.0 S— <br />LW: New D.61 S—im <br />= ANNUAL NET CASH <br />=REQUMMENTS <br />ANNUAL- <br />FIV.E YEAR FINANCIAL <br />FIVE YEAR <br />FIVE YEAR <br />COST OF SERVICE & <br />RATE STRUCTURE <br />FULLY ALLOCATED <br />COST OF SERVICE STUDY <br />SPECIFIC NATES <br />CHARGES AND FEES IMPACT FEE UPDATE (II aOPlicadel <br />Clear Vision <br />The chart on the left examines the impact of two rate structure alternatives upon single <br />family customers at various identified levels of water usage. The chart on the right examines the <br />impact of the same two rate structure alternatives in terms of percentage increase in monthly bill <br />along a continuum of water usage from 0 to 95,000 gallons per month. This chart also shows the <br />percentage of customers at all levels of usage. This can be used to determine the percentage of <br />customers affected by each rate structure alternative at different levels of usage. <br />CWPW son 0(MbM* Bibs - Alt ANWrN6res <br />P,95dembd 0.0tann-W XYW METERS <br />$Z00 <br />$175 <br />S15D <br />i$ $125 <br />4100 <br />$75 <br />>5D <br />so <br />1.000 66,1.Q..0�DD25,000.�0, 50,000 <br />Strucwm L— 1 2 <br />NOVEMBER 5, 1997 <br />-26- <br />AMUNnac CLO70MM <br />SB" X 3W METERS - WATER & SEWER <br />40% f?X 'am a6X 1 100% <br />3096 - MI eox <br />20% � o <br />x. <br />10% <br />096Dowru'7- v <br />0 6 /0 16 40 46 30 7610 46 W 16 6D 66 70 76 6D 66 60 96 <br />KOK INFri <br />