Laserfiche WebLink
powerlines and landscaping to ensure that landscaping efforts are not wasted by putting the <br />wrong tree in the wrong place, resulting in severely pruned canopies in the future. Therefore, <br />staff proposes to "designate" a 30' zone next to high voltage powerlines (the area of FP&L's <br />concerns) as an area requiring special attention in regard to canopy tree placement and species <br />selection. For projects proposing to locate landscaping within this 30' zone, staffs proposal <br />would require applicants to estimate the size and shape of the future mature tree canopy in <br />relation to the actual horizontal and vertical location of adjacent powerlines. The amendments <br />would require a minimum distance of 3' from the estimated edge of mature tree canopy to a <br />powerline. The 3' separation distance is based upon -the National Electric Safety Code <br />standard of requiring a 3' separation from an electrical service drop to an adjacent structure <br />to avoid arcing between the electrical service and the adjacent structure. The 3' distance is <br />also consistent with FP&L's suggested distance between powerlines and the edge of adjacent <br />palm tree fronds. <br />[Page 8 of the amendments) Changes have been made to special buffering requirements for <br />loading docks that are proposed on sites adjacent to residential areas. As now proposed, an <br />8' wall requirement would apply only to projects that normally require frequent dock use (e.g. <br />grocery stores, department stores, and big box retail). This approach was suggested at the <br />June 26th PSAC meeting, and is now incorporated within the proposed amendments. Also, <br />language similar to existing landscaping ordinance wording is proposed in regard to loading <br />docks to ensure that the 8' wall would not be required where an intervening building or <br />structure screens the dock from view from adjacent residential property. <br />In staff s opinion, these proposed post -workshop changes reflect input and direction given by the <br />Board at the September 8th workshop. Other matters addressed at the workshop, such as roadside <br />landscaping provided by the public, fiuther corridor planning, and staff training and landscaping <br />inspection practices, are being handled outside of the LDR amendment process. <br />RECOMMENDATION.• <br />Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners: <br />Direct staff to make any necessary changes to the landscaping amendments and incorporate <br />such amendments into an LDR ordinance; and <br />2. Announce its intentions to take final action on the proposed amendments at the Board's <br />hearing scheduled for December 16, 1997 at 9:05 am. <br />POST WORKSHOP VERSION <br />PROPOSED LANDSCAPING/BUFFER LDR CHANGES <br />(REVISED 11/14/97) <br />1. TREE SIZE REQUIREMENTS <br />Amending landscaping chapter 926.06(2): <br />(2) Drought tolerance requirements. A minimum of fifty (50) percent of total <br />cumulative landscape plant material used to meet the provisions of this chapter <br />shall be "moderately" or "very" drought tolerant, as classified and listed in the most <br />recent edition of the "South Florida Water Management District Xeriscape Plant <br />Guide" or a comparable publication. Existing native plant species preserved on- <br />site may be considered as credit toward the drought tolerance percentage <br />requirement. <br />Amend landscaping chapter section 926.06(3)(a) -(d) as follows: <br />(3) Trees. <br />(a) Canopy trees <br />1. CanoDV trees shall be species having an average mature spread of <br />crown of greater than fifteen (15) feet (under local climatic <br />conditions) and eventually having a trunk(s) with over five (5) feet <br />of clear wood. <br />2. Installed canopy trees shall be considered "mature" 7 years after <br />installation. <br />DECEMBER 1, 1997 -11- <br />BOOK 103 PaGE a`�57 <br />