Laserfiche WebLink
r- <br />&C -19K —103' FACE GSD <br />Director Boling briefly responded to and clarified a couple of concerns raised by <br />Commissioner Gum. <br />The Chairman opened the public hearing and asked if anyone wished to be heard <br />in this matter. <br />Lawrence Rosedale stated that he works for Gibralter Management Company in <br />Terrytown, New York. He represents the owners of the property adjacent and <br />immediately to the east of the property being considered. The owners are GPR Powers <br />Avenue, limited liability corporation. They have no objection whatsoever to the rezoning <br />request. He has some concerns with respect to the site plan, especially the main <br />driveway. He has spoken with Karl Hedin and his attorney and his engineer about this <br />matter and Mr. Hedin is aware of what he will be saying. They believe it would be best if <br />the main entrance/exit shares the center line with their property, then when the property is <br />developed, there will be one main entrance to both developments. Although late, this was <br />his first opportunity to make this request, that a condition be added that Mr. Hedin's main <br />entrance be relocated to fall between the two properties. They have no other objection <br />with the planned development of the adjoining property. <br />Director Boling pointed out the request on the landscape plan and stated there <br />could be a change to a common driveway, but it would require an agreement of the owner <br />of the other property and should not be made a condition of the applicant because the <br />applicant does not control all the rights to a common driveway. The plan as presented <br />would not preclude a modification to allow a common driveway. Staff would support a <br />common driveway if it can be worked out. It would have to be done through an <br />agreement of the two property owners; the County would not be involved and it would <br />not have to come back through the public hearing process. <br />Karl Hedin stated he had no objection to working this out at a later date, but did <br />not want it to interfere with approval at this time. He will work with Mr. Rosedale. <br />It was determined that no one else wished to be heard and the Chairman closed the <br />public hearing. <br />32 <br />December 9, 1997 <br />