My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2/24/1998
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1998
>
2/24/1998
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:10:56 PM
Creation date
6/17/2015 10:39:16 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
02/24/1998
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
72
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
DCA has raised 37 objections to the county's revised plan. The following list indicates the number <br />of objections by plan element: <br />ELEMENTS* <br /># OF OBJECTIONS <br />Capital Improvements (Concurrency <br />Management System) <br />2 <br />Future Land Use <br />5 <br />Future Land Use Map <br />2 <br />Housing <br />4 <br />Infrastructure <br />8 <br />Coastal Management <br />6 <br />Conservation <br />5 <br />Transportation <br />5 <br />* There are no objections to the other elements <br />Future Land Use Map <br />Recently, the issue of zoning density vs. comprehensive plan land use map designation density arose <br />with a rezoning request on Indian River Boulevard. Because of recent court cases and judicial <br />decisions, local governments have less discretion in considering rezoning requests. Current law now <br />requires that, once an applicant demonstrates that his rezoning request is consistent with the <br />comprehensive plan, then the burden shifts to the local government to demonstrate that maintaining <br />the existing zoning classification accomplishes a legitimate public purpose. <br />Consequently, local governments rezoning a property to a density lower than allowed by the - <br />comprehensive plan land use map may not act in an arbitrary, discriminatory or unreasonable manner. <br />For that reason, it is important that the Board of County Commissioners feel comfortable with the <br />land use plan map and the densities reflected on that map. <br />The county's future land uses are depicted on the future land use map, which is adopted as part of <br />the county's comprehensive plan. The following table identifies each of the county's residential land <br />use designations, their maximum densities, and the number of acres within the county having each <br />designation. <br />Land Use Designation <br />Maximum Density <br />Number of Acres <br />R, Rural Residential <br />1 unittacre <br />956 <br />L-1, Low -Density Residential -1 <br />3 unitstacre <br />12,574 <br />L-2, Low -Density Residential -2 <br />6 units/acre <br />13,532 <br />M-1, Medium -Density Residential -1 <br />8 units/acre <br />5,158 <br />M-2, Medium -Density Residential -2 <br />10 units/acre <br />1,071 <br />In Indian River County, the highest residential land use designation is M-2, Medium Density <br />Residential up to 10 units per acre. The county's future land use map designates only 1,071 acres <br />as M-2. That land is located in two areas of the county. One area is on the mainland, east of US 1, <br />between Oslo Road and the southern boundary of the City of Vero Beach. The other area is in <br />Gifford; it is generally bounded by the City of Vero Beach on the south, 58'Avenue on the west, 49d' <br />Street on the north, and the Florida East Coast railroad tracks right-of-way on the east. <br />FEBRUARY 24, 1998 <br />-50- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.