Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />*ftg public arterial mond currently border the site. On the west is US #1, a 4 lane mad with 70 feet of <br />A& -Of -way- On the north is 41- Street, a 2 ]ane road with 100 feet of public <br />mad right-yf-way. On the east's Indian River Boulevard, a 4 land mad with 200 feet of public mad <br />nght-of- improvements to these mads are currently Pmgramme& <br />Centralized potable water braes mand to the site from the South County Reverse Osmosis P <br />while wastewater collection lines extend to the site from the Cert w Co �' <br />Plant. County Wastewater Treatment <br />The most intense use of the site allowed under the proposed land use designation is calculated to be <br />10,000 square feet of mail shopping center per acre of land proposed for redesigoaticm At that tate, <br />the most intense use of the site would be 1,82UM square feet of rash <br />development would be significantlymmmdy in ce <br />larger than any shopping center ccurrently nter. Such a <br />the county,including the Indian River Mall. A review of the traffic impacts that would result from such a <br />development an dee subject property indicates that the existing level of service "D" or better on <br />impacted roadways would not be lowered The site inf conation used for deters imug traffic Impacts <br />is as follows: <br />1. Use Identified in 6th Edition ITE Manual: Shopping Center <br />2. For 1,825,000 sq.R. Shopping Centers in 6th Edition ITE Manual: <br />a P.M. Peak Hour Trip Ends: 2.3 /1,000 square feet <br />b. Inbound (P.M. Peak Hour): 50% <br />L Northbound (P.M. Peak Hour): 60% <br />ii. Southbound (PAL Peak Hour): 40% <br />C. Outbound (P.M. Peak Hour): 50% <br />L Northbound (P.M. Peak Hour): 40% <br />ii. Southbound (P.M. Peak Hots): 60% <br />3. Peak Direction of Indian River Boulevard, from west Vero Beach city limits to 53'" Street: <br />Northbound <br />4. Percentage of Project Trips on This Segment of Indian River Boulevard: 50 <br />5. Formula for Detnmimng Number of Peak Hour/Peak Season/Peak <br />Generated an the Most Direction Trips <br />tal Segment of the Roadway Network (Indian River <br />Boulevard): To <br />Square Footage X "L Peak Hoar Rate X Inbound PAL Percentage <br />X Inbound -Northbound Percentage X Percentage of Trips on Indian River Boulevard <br />(1,825,000 X 233/1,000 X.5 X.6 X.5 - 638) <br />(rep daft== based an FSUTMS Madel) <br />6. Traffic Capacity on this segntnt of Indian Rivet Boulevard, at a Level of Service "D": <br />1,890 peak hour/peak season/peak direction trips <br />7. Total Segment Demand (eatistmg volume + vested volume <br />Boulevard: 651 peak hour/peak seaso ) on this segment of Indian River <br />n/peak direction trips <br />Staff used the above kf nation and a methodology simil to the one used for the previous site to <br />determine traffic impacts. The only difference in the methodologies is related to the characteristics <br />of the sites. Those characteristics indicate that the previous site would likay have only one <br />ewancrJe= onto the roadway network, In contrast, development on the much <br />would likely have several �ee/eMt larger subject , R site <br />Boulevard would receive 50% of dee points. A trip distri'butiem model indicates that Indian River <br />gam.' tathex than assignall Ulps <br />to one <br />road as was done with the <br />Boulevard. previous 'only 50s1te'/0 of the tib were L to Indian River <br />Based on that distdbwtion, staff deteratined that the additional 638 trips armed by the most intense <br />use of the subject property under the proposed amendment would increase the Total Segment <br />Demand for this segment of Indian River Boulevard to approximately 1,289, less than its capacity <br />at LOS -D" (1,890). <br />MARCH 10, 1998 <br />