Laserfiche WebLink
Fr I <br />E,OOK IU FA6E <br />Commissioner Ginn then called attention to Page 99, Objective 4, which she felt was <br />inconsistent with Objective 1, Policy 1.3, page 94, and County Attorney Vitunac explained <br />that the figures were per capita versus per ERU. <br />Commissioner Ginn pointed out Policy 4.2, a new requirement, on page 99, as to the <br />use of drought -tolerant vegetation, and Director Keating stated that this change, "require ... <br />to the extent feasible", was done because DCA did not approve non-specific language. <br />A lengthy discussion ensued and several suggested phrases were mentioned. <br />Environmental Planning & Code Enforcement Chief Roland M. DeBlois suggested <br />that Policy 4.2 could be changed to "shall continue to apply the County's land development <br />regulations relating to requirements of drought tolerance". All agreed with his suggested <br />verbiage. <br />Lastly, Commissioner Ginn pointed to page 102, Objective 7, concerning private <br />wells, Policy 7.1., where residential projects consisting of less than 25 units and located more <br />than 1/4 mile from a county water line could have a private well. She found that very <br />generous. <br />At least 3 Commissioners disagreed and Commissioner Ginn bowed to their wisdom. <br />Commissioner Eggert AMENDED HER MOTION to include <br />Mr. DeBlois' language whereby Policy 4.2 could be changed to <br />"shall continue to apply the County's land development <br />regulations relating to requirements of drought tolerance"; <br />Commissioner Adams SECONDED THE AMENDMENT. <br />Commissioner Adams complimented staff for including, under Coastal Management, <br />the implementation of the Indian River Lagoon National Estuary Program Comprehensive <br />Plan recommendations. <br />The Chairman CALLED THE QUESTION and the motion <br />passed unanimously. (Ordinance 98-05 and Resolution 98-34 <br />adopted). <br />March 17,1998 <br />26 <br />