Laserfiche WebLink
Background <br />Following the death of her husband, William, on March 6, 1995, Susan Roberts through <br />her attorney, Louis B. Vocelle, Jr. filed suit against the County for excess life insurance <br />benefits in the amount of $60,000.00. Mr. Roberts, a Buildings and Grounds employee at <br />the time of his death, was in a job classification included within the Teamsters union which <br />at the time of Mr. Roberts' death was negotiating with the County its initial c:ontrad. <br />Because the excess fife insurance was a new employee benefit, and upon advice of labor <br />counsel, the County was negotiating this benefit for bargaining unit employees including <br />not only the Teamsters but also fire fighters and paramedics. At the time of his death, this <br />benefit had not been negotiated. <br />Analysis <br />On March 10, staff and defense counsel, Lyman Reynolds, participated in mediation Mich <br />was required prior to the April 22 trial docket We brought back to the Staff Claims Review <br />Committee, composed of the County Administrator, County Attorney, Budget Director, <br />General Services Director, and Risk Manager, the plaintiffs demand of $65,000.00. The <br />Committee unanimously rejected the offer. Mr. Vocelle, however, has asked to appear at <br />this public hearing to address the Board directly on his settlement demand. Attached is <br />the Motion for Summary Judgment prepared by Mr. Reynolds which outlines the County's <br />legal position in this matter. Mr. Reynolds figtlher recommends the Board exercise extreme <br />caution in discussion of this matter in the public hearing as the matter involves pending <br />litigation. <br />Recommendation <br />The Staff Claims Review Committee recommends that the Board not accept the settlement <br />offer of $65,000.00 and that the County proceed to trial on the April 22 docket <br />Attorney Lyman Reynolds recounted the background of the case Roberts v. Indian <br />River County and recommended, as the County's special counsel and on behalf of staff that <br />the Board not accept the Plaintiff's settlement offer of $65,000 and to proceed to trial on the <br />April 22' docket. <br />Attorney Louis B. "Buck" Vocelle, Jr. presented the case on behalf of the Plaintiff, <br />Susan Roberts. He presented two handouts to the Commissioners which have been placed <br />on file with the backup of the meeting. He asked that the Commission consider approving <br />a settlement in the amount of $65,000 in order to avoid the unknown outcome of a court <br />case, based on the fact that were a number of things that could have been done, that were not <br />done, to ensure that the Roberts family understood that they did not have the insurance. <br />Commissioner Adams was concerned about hearing this matter and whether or not the <br />Commission should be commenting. <br />County Attorney Vitunac noted that a court reporter was taking a verbatim, which <br />is not unusual for a public meeting, since we always take minutes. The Board has the right <br />to meet in private if they wish, but it was the consensus of the County's staff that there was <br />nothing to hide and it could be talked about in a public meeting. If the Board wished to meet <br />in private, there were certain procedures they must follow, but it could be done. There <br />would be nothing wrong with settling this now if that is their wish. If it is not, then the <br />matter would go to trial in two weeks. <br />April 7,1998 <br />