My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
4/21/1998
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1998
>
4/21/1998
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:10:56 PM
Creation date
6/17/2015 10:54:52 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
04/21/1998
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
89
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />with surrounding uses and the potential impacts to nearby residential areas of each of the <br />alternate sites with County staff. There is concurrence between the County Community <br />Development Department and the City staff that the proposed site is appropriate for a <br />substation. Further, only one boundary of this site abuts property that is used for residential <br />purposes. <br />The Indian River County Comprehensive Plan and Land Development Regulations recognize <br />that public facilities, including electrical substations, must be located within residential zoning <br />districts. Thus, the use itself has been predetermined to be compatible with other uses allowed <br />in residential districts as long as the development complies with the Land Development <br />Regulations. The proposed substation complies with or exceeds all of the County Land <br />Development Regulations. Further, the plan significantly exceeds the landscaping <br />requirements. <br />Uses that surround the site include a single family home to the west, 58m Avenue and groves to <br />the east, 2& Street and vacant RS -3 zoned property to the north and the Westminster <br />Presbyterian Church to the south. When considering compatibility with surrounding uses, <br />issues such as traffic generation, drainage, nuisance impacts, lighting, noise, aesthetics, use <br />intensity, bulk of buildings, and building height are generally addressed. Most of these issues <br />have been addressed in the report from the Community Development Department to the <br />Planning and Zoning Commission (attached) dated March 18, 1988. The proposed substation <br />will create virtually no impact on the surrounding uses. Traffic and noise will be virtually <br />non-existent and the site will be extremely well landscaped. Compared to the adjacent church <br />that apparently was found to meet the standards included in the Comprehensive Plan and Land <br />Development Regulations, the substation will have virtually no impact and will be very <br />compatible with surrounding uses. <br />A good example of a public facility expansion that has been determined necessary by the <br />County is the widening of 58' Avenue. Certainly noise, traffic, dust, drainage, and lighting <br />associated with the roadway expansion does not represent the most desirable setting for the <br />single family development that will be adjacent to the expanded roadway. The roadway <br />widening will have both positive and adverse impacts on the public health safety and welfare. <br />However, the overall good of the public and compliance with the Comprehensive Plan have <br />led the County to move forward with expansion of the roadway. The location of an electrical <br />substation along the roadway to accommodate existing and future development is no less <br />important than widening of the roadway. Just as failure to expand the roadway will result in <br />interruptions in traffic flow and a poorly operating transportation system; failure to allow the <br />substation will result in interruptions in electricity flow and a poorly operating electric <br />distribution system. <br />In terms of noise, traffic, dust, drainage, lighting and other potential nuisances, the proposed <br />substation will have a much less impact on the surrounding land uses than the roadway <br />expansion. <br />NO ADVERSE BIPACTS ON PUBLIC HEALTH, SAFETY AND WELFARE <br />Obviously, public facilities have to be expanded from time to time to meet the demands of <br />growth. The County Comprehensive Plan policies recognize this fact and require the County <br />to take appropriate action. Expansion of public facilities is generally done to promote positive <br />impacts on the public health, safety and welfare. For instance, if a substation is not built, the <br />potential for electric outages during the peak use time increases. The peak use times are <br />generally when there is extreme cold or heat. These are the times when negative public health <br />impacts are felt if the power supply is not maintained. <br />The Land Development Regulations require that the proposal include any landscape and <br />structural improvements to effectively mitigate potential negative impacts of the use. In <br />response to this requirement, the City proposal includes substantial setbacks, significantly <br />more landscape buffering than required by the County Land Development Regulations and <br />underground transmission lines coming into the substation and underground distribution lines <br />leaving the substation. The only overhead lines that will be present will be those that will be <br />present regardless of the location of the substation. <br />The proposed substation will have no adverse impacts on the public health, safety or general <br />welfare. <br />PROMOTE ORDERLY DEVELOPMENT <br />Orderly development that depends on the availability of electrical power cannot occur without <br />construction of a substation that will provide for distribution of that electrical power. <br />APRIL 211,1998 <br />0 <br />-39- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.