My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5/26/1998
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1998
>
5/26/1998
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:10:57 PM
Creation date
6/17/2015 11:02:52 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
05/26/1998
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
83
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
60;x., _0 � PAGE Uv <br />Responding to the question, Vice Chairman Macht explained the requests were going <br />to the Human Services Department for evaluation of the quality and the necessity of the <br />services and were in concert with Director Baird for the fiscal input. The information will <br />be presented to the Board of County Commissioners at budget time at which time the public <br />and applicants all shall have the opportunity to speak. The Commission has the option to <br />accept or reject. <br />Mr. Legwen asked that the entire Commission affirm Vice Chairman Macht's <br />remarks. He felt the public has a right to speak at the Committee's meetings. He pointed out <br />that these meetings are not televised as are the Board of County Commissioners' meetings, <br />therefore, the public cannot be aware of the meetings unless they are in attendance or read <br />the minutes. In his opinion, the minutes probably will not reflect that the public was not <br />permitted to ask questions on May 20'h. He has not been able to get a copy of those minutes <br />as they are not ready yet. <br />Vice Chairman Macht defended the Chairman's position as there was a long agenda <br />and many people to interview, and the Chairman felt it was better to confine questions to <br />the committee members. There was nothing to prevent Mr. Legwen from meeting <br />individually to make the inquiries after the meeting. <br />Mr. Legwen then complained that the press was not in attendance, and Vice Chairman <br />Macht responded that the County cannot require the press to be there. <br />Mr. Legwen understood but added that when the meetings are posted and scheduled <br />for Tuesdays and then changed to Thursdays, it is very difficult for anyone, press or public, <br />to be able to plan to attend. He reiterated that this process has side-stepped going through <br />Budget Director Baird, whose position it is to be able to evaluate and render an opinion to <br />the Board on the funding requests. He thought it would be fine to have the requests go <br />through Director Baird's office first and then to the committee. In the past, he had been able <br />to obtain copies of information from the Budget Office, but was unable to get any copies or <br />any extra packets for public review. He thought that the policy of not having the <br />information available before the meeting, only after the meeting at 15 cents per page, was <br />wrong. He thought the Commissioners should have some control over the monies being <br />handed out and should use the office of Budget to assist. <br />Commissioner Ginn commented that she had voted against the CSN because of her <br />fear that a sub -committee consisting of as few as three people would be making the <br />recommendations on who would receive the money and those would be the only <br />May 26, 1998 <br />52 <br />0 41 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.