Laserfiche WebLink
�y <br />� <br />BOOK 106 �,q 68 <br />Director Boling advised that the rest of the attachments had been distributed which <br />had inadvertently been omitted from the backup. (Attachments have been filed with the <br />backup in the office of the Clerk to the Board.) The memorandum indicated a vote of 7-0 <br />of the Planning and Zoning Commission, the correct vote was 6-0. <br />Commissioner Ginn hoped that the design of the building would not be like the one <br />on 6' Avenue (Gardenia Gardens) which she thought looked like a "prison", and Director <br />Boling assured her that the design of this project was much different and would have <br />abundant landscaping as well. A color drawing (design board) of the proposed building was <br />displayed by the applicant which allayed her fears. <br />Commissioner Ginn wondered why such a difference in design and why, as has been <br />reported in the newspaper, Gardenia Gardens still had empty units. She speculated that <br />maybe the county did not need any more low-income elderly housing. <br />Community Development Director Bob Keating explained the funding differences <br />between the project before them and Gardenia Gardens (a HUD project). He also pointed <br />out that Gardenia Gardens was aimed at a lower income elderly population, with <br />significantly lower rents. The design might be another explanation for the space still <br />available there. <br />Vice Chairman Macht asked how it happened after all the prior comments made about <br />Kyle's Run, and Director Boling explained that Gardenia Gardens was treated as a standard <br />multi -family project (apartment building) which did not come before the Board of County <br />Commissioners, just before the Planning and Zoning Commission. So, there were no special <br />plan development requirements applied to it. What had come before them was River Park <br />Place, which has completely different elevations and architecture. <br />Commissioner Ginn stressed that she thought the area was being over -built and <br />reiterated her past disagreement with density bonuses. She believed the County needs to pull <br />back. <br />Vice Chairman Macht asked if this project did not fill up, if there was an escape <br />clause that would allow them to open to other than elderly. <br />Director Keating assured the Board that both the County's requirements and their <br />financing (Florida Housing Finance Agency) commit them to keeping the type of clientele <br />identified for the period of time. The units must be kept affordable for 28 years. He <br />understood that it would be policed by the FHFA. <br />June 9, 1998 <br />.c <br />I <br />