My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
6/16/1998
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1998
>
6/16/1998
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:10:57 PM
Creation date
6/17/2015 11:06:10 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
06/16/1998
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
40
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
F, <br />BOOK 106 wit i25 <br />1. Size of Area to be Rezoned: 11.72 acres <br />2. Land Use Designation: C/I, Commercial/Industrial <br />3. Existing Zoning District: IL, Light Industrial <br />4. Proposed Zoning District: CG, General Commercial <br />5. Most Intense Use Under Existing Zoning District: <br />±17,200 sq. ft of Retail Commercial (Shopping Center in the 6'h Edition ITE Manual). <br />6. Most Intense Use Under Proposed Zoning District: <br />+17,200 sq. ft, of Retail Commercial (Shopping Center in the 6' Edition ITE Manual). <br />As per section 910.07(2) of the Concurrency Management Chapter of the County's Land <br />Development Regulations, projects which do not increase density or intensity of use are exempt from <br />concurrency requirements. This rezoning request is exempt from concurrency review because the <br />requested zoning would not increase the use intensity of the site. <br />By changing the zoning of the subject property from IL to CG, some commercial uses not currently <br />allowed would be permitted on the site. However, because the most intense use of the property <br />would be the same with either zoning district, changing the property's zoning from IL to CG would <br />not create additional impacts on any concurrency facilities. <br />In this case, a detailed concurrency analysis will be done in conjunction with site development. That <br />concurrency analysis will address facility service levels and demand. <br />Some sites in Indian River County can be appropriate for either CG or IL zoning. Such sites should <br />be within the urban service area and have easy access to the county transportation system. <br />Additionally, those sites should be separated from existing and future residential development. The <br />subject property meets those criteria. <br />Located within the county's urban service area, and near railroad tracks and major roads, <br />development of the site under either the existing IL or the requested CG zoning district would be <br />compatible with surrounding areas. Because property to the east of the subject property is zoned <br />CG, the subject request is for a continuation of an existing zoning pattern. These characteristics <br />make this site particularly appropriate for the highway oriented retail uses permitted in the CG <br />district. <br />Bounded by three major roads, the site does not abut any residential property. Because compatibility <br />problems generally involve areas where residential and non-residential uses abut, compatibility <br />between the subject property and adjacent IL zoned property to the north is not a major concern. At <br />±1.72 acres and ±5.08 acres in size, respectively, both the subject property and the site to the north <br />are vacant and are large enough to accommodate buffers when developed. <br />For these reasons, development of the subject property under the requested CG district would be <br />compatible with surrounding areas. <br />ronsistency with Cnmprchensive Plan <br />Rezoning requests are reviewed for consistency with all policies of the comprehensive plan. <br />Rezonings must also be consistent with the overall designation of land uses as depicted on the Future <br />Land Use Map, which include agriculture, residential, recreation, conservation, and commercial and <br />industrial land uses and their densities. Commercial and industrial land uses are located in nodes <br />throughout the unincorporated areas of Indian River County. <br />The goals, objectives, and policies are the most important parts of the comprehensive plan. Policies <br />are statements in the plan that identify the actions which the county will take in order to direct the <br />community's development. As courses of action committed to by the county, policies provide the <br />basis for all county land development decisions. While all comprehensive plan policies are <br />important, some have more applicability than others in reviewing rezoning requests. Of particular <br />applicability for this request are Future Land Use Element Policies 1.15 and 1.16. <br />JUNE 169 1998 <br />-18- <br />-I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.