My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7/28/1998
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1998
>
7/28/1998
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:10:58 PM
Creation date
6/17/2015 11:10:02 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
07/28/1998
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
70
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I <br />'GOOK 106, 'Ft <br />Commissioner Ginn advised that she had brought this subject before them again <br />because of the selection of 4 subcommittee members who were very strong and vocal. She <br />also felt it was inappropriate that the one of their wives has an interest in one of the agencies <br />which will be receiving funding. She stressed that the membership of the subcommittees <br />should be reviewed and approved by the Board of County Commissioners. She foresaw <br />future problems because of increased funding. She suggested it might be a solution to <br />discontinue the CSNetwork completely and put it to a vote of the public. She asked if had <br />to be an independent or a dependent committee. <br />County Attorney Vitunac advised that children's services is one of the areas which <br />Florida law allows to be independent, if there is a referendum setting it up that way. Our <br />county has always tried to keep committees dependent upon the Board of County <br />Commissioners. <br />She agreed with that, but asked if there could be a referendum, and was told no. She <br />advised that she had found there is not a lot of public support for it. She felt that if the <br />money of the public is being spent in this way, the Board needed to have a better feel for <br />how the public sees it and whether or not they want their money spent in this manner. <br />Vice Chairman Macht suggested a "straw ballot", to which Commissioner Ginn <br />agreed. He also suggested a "straw ballot" concerning purchase of Lost Tree Islands, and <br />Commissioner Ginn agreed to that as well. Vice Chairman Macht felt that might clear up <br />a lot of concerns. <br />Commissioner Eggert pointed out that a vote concerning the islands should have a <br />price attached to it, and Vice Chairman Macht replied that it should be at the appraised value. <br />Chairman Tippin appointed Commissioners Ginn and Macht as a committee of two <br />to come up with the straw ballot questions. <br />Sunshine violation concerns were voiced and Vice Chairman Macht suggested the <br />County Attorney's office should come up with the wording for the Board's approval. <br />Commissioner Ginn asked that County Attorney Vitunac advise them as to how they <br />canproceed concerning the subcommittee appointments that have been deemed to be outside <br />of the ordinance and guide. <br />County Attorney Vitunac set out the following options: 1) to void the actions of the <br />subcommittee, saying they did not do it correctly; 2) to approve retroactively the membership <br />of the subcommittees and accept the recommendation today as if they had been proper <br />members at the start; 3) to approve the membership today and send it back for an additional <br />July 28, 1998 <br />62 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.